so what are we going to do about social security when they run out ?

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,853
1,048
126
I'm 24. I think I estimated my age to be 62 (retirement age at 64) when they will "run out". Think the estimate sheet said only 75% of us will be able to receive social security. W T F is wrong with this picture.
 

minendo

Elite Member
Aug 31, 2001
35,558
16
81
I've already accepted the fact that I will receive no social security benefits.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,853
1,048
126
Well I know we have other things like 401k... but are we (my age and younger) still paying the social security tax ?! Bastages.
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Originally posted by: minendo
I've already accepted the fact that I will receive no social security benefits.

I am already well on my way to assuming that I will be getting a big fat goose egg. Start saving now. It adds up over time. $50 a month will end up being 250k in 40 years.

 

PsychoAndy

Lifer
Dec 31, 2000
10,735
0
0
I dont plan on getting $ from uncle sam. All the current SS money goes to the treasury for assorted gubment expenses. Uncle sam just left a big IOU in the SS fund.

-PAB
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,349
259
126
Social Security was only intended to ensure that elderly people don't starve to death or get kicked out into the street. Above that, you're on your own.
 

Dhruv

Senior member
May 15, 2001
729
0
0
ha what good are iras and 401ks in this economy.

if what happened this year happens 40 years from now, we'll be screwed. better move to a developing country and take advantage of the cost of living factor, like Mexico or something. as far as investment, i think a high yield bond would be safest.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Soylent Green.

Clean out the old folks AND end world hunger :D

as far as investment, i think a high yield bond would be safest.
not over a 20-year period -- an S&P500 mutual fund will do much better than a bond fund. The people who got wiped out when the tech bubble burst or after 9/11 were the ones with individual stocks or agressive mutual funds. S&P500 funds gave up a couple of years of gains but if you'd bought them in (say) '95 you'd still be ahead.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: bunker
Originally posted by: minendo
I've already accepted the fact that I will receive no social security benefits.

Same here. Maybe, someday, I'll get some benefit from it.

Looking back, I wish I would have voted for Gore. At least he would've set things in motion to pay off the national debt.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,113
925
126
I don't believe it will ever completely go away, but I sure would not depend on it for living in my retirement years. I am very pro-privatization. I believe people should be mandated to invest their money, but not necessarily deducted and contributed to SS. I think we ought to have a choice as to which funds we want that money in, within reason.