• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

So the new neocon tactics here are...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
There was nothing wrong with my question, it didn't ignore his post either. I was trying to put his post in context. Both are against this war. I was asking if they will always be against war. Simple question.

CkG
Click to expand...

In context of what? He is arguing actually for the need of a consensus for going to war and that a single entity deciding, might not always be the best thing. That could imply that unanimous decicios for or against war are better.
So again, what context?
 
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
There was nothing wrong with my question, it didn't ignore his post either. I was trying to put his post in context. Both are against this war. I was asking if they will always be against war. Simple question.

CkG
Click to expand...

In context of what? He is arguing actually for the need of a consensus for going to war and that a single entity deciding, might not always be the best thing. That could imply that unanimous decicios for or against war are better.
So again, what context?
Click to expand...

I wasn't asking you genius. The point is gone.

CkG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top