So many options! I just want simple spware and antivirus removers

scheibler1

Banned
Feb 17, 2008
333
0
0
I am looking to buy an antivirus and also an anti spyware utility for my gaming pc. Preferably something that is never running unless I choose to do a scan so that it doens't use memory and stuff while I am gaming.

I used spysweeper years ago and noticed it always found a lot of shit. Never used antivirus though besides norton which I hated

help!
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
SuperAntispyware's free version plus AntiVir's free or paid version.

Realize that there's value to real-time protection and security. You don't want to be late to the party... if you miss your chance to get the first punch in, you might regret it later, e.g. when you find out your WoW account and all your stuff got swiped and auctioned off, or your game CD keys got stolen off your system, or whatever. Too late. other security suggestions to go along with that.

The current version of Norton security products is said to be vastly improved over the old versions, so you could also consider trying the trialware and see if you agree.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
First of all, you should be able to put together a very good security system without paying a dime. Although I don't recommend it, you can use msconfig to take your AV and antispywares off your start up list, and then open them up by clicking their icons when you want to scan. Then use either the sp2 firewall or a low footprint firewall like sygate
or kerio.

In terms of what you might try.---other may recommend other things.

Firewall----sp2 or sygate 5.5 or 5.6---or kerio
AV----avast or avira free ( avast can be shut down and is free---antivirus would have to be taken off the start up list from what I can see.)
antispyware---superantispyware, AVG antispyware, a2, ( you should be able to take those off the start up list )
I would run spyware blaster 3.5.1 full time because it has almost zero footprint.
Process control---spyware terminator 2.1.1.314 which can be shut down for gaming.

And if you can game using a non administrative account, that would be a giant security plus. Especially if you have XP pro and can use a non adminitrative account with a full software restriction policy. See the security thread on top of this forum.
 

scheibler1

Banned
Feb 17, 2008
333
0
0
hmm. well I have windows xp home sp2. I don't mind running antivirus/antispyware programs as long as they have a small footprint and won't affect my gaming too much...I have 2gigs of ram. I also don't mind spending money if that is a better setup
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Originally posted by: scheibler1
hmm. well I have windows xp home sp2. I don't mind running antivirus/antispyware programs as long as they have a small footprint and won't affect my gaming too much...I have 2gigs of ram. I also don't mind spending money if that is a better setup

At the price RAM is down to lately, consider slapping another 1GB in there if you have a couple more slots available. I mean, if you're going to spend money... ;) yeah.

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
There is almost no doubt that previous versions of Norton that were high footprint have soured you. As mechBgon pointed out, that is no longer as true about Norton now.

But if you have 2 gigs of ram, a fast processor, a fast system bus, and a fast video card, there is little you can do to improve your gaming abilities without making major hardware investments in a new computer. And I assume you have found, from experience, that running a bloatware security system does hurt your gaming.

First, you need to face the following facts. In the world of gaming, there will always be that new game(s) that won't run on your system even with zero system security in place. But at the same time, there are many many games that will run well on your system with no security running at the same time. And a slightly lesser amounts of games that will run well on your system with some security running at the same time. And that running no real time system security is always a giant risk. Because if you can't prevent an exploit, you will lose a lot of time removing the virus or trojan once it installs. Time lost from doing the gaming you enjoy.

So you have what amounts to a risk vs. reward problem.

I just told you what you the risks, but it seems to me, you have no damn idea of the rewards. Thats where benchmarking programs come in. Things that take no system resources until you open them up. You already have one such program called msconfig. ( go start---run--type msconfig ) Msconfig will give you a wealth of information about how much ram each running program consumes and give you an ability to prevent programs starting up at boot time. Step it up a notch and try freeware benchmarks like Everest 2.2 or pcwizard 2008 that will give you system benchmarks like, rams speeds, HDD stats, and video frames per second. And may also suggest where your system bottlenecks are. And also let you know what temperatures you are running and your over clocking potential.

Once you are thus loaded for bear, the gasp hard work starts. You can try various security programs starting up or not starting up and find out how much it hurts your gaming.
With both a seat of the pants feel and hard bench mark numbers to go with it. You are better off trying that with freeware because you paid nothing if you get rid of it.

Right now, probably the best paid AV is Kaspersky, which combines excellent detection rates with frequent small updates. But during those updates, it may kill your gaming. But if you can disable automatic updates while gaming, it might be worth paying for it. But I would still recommend a freeware AV first.
 

xgsound

Golden Member
Jan 22, 2002
1,374
8
81
For spyware, free Superantispyware is hard to beat and preferences will allow you to disable startup with windows.

For antivirus, all of the free a/vs (AVG, Avast, and Antivir) can be used with close to no system impact with bootup and real time protection. There's really no reason not to use one of them. I've used AVG for years which has very low resource use, and even on a Pentium 100 there was little impact on speed. AVG is said to not be as effective against trojans as others, but a periodic scan with Suerantispyware picks up any slack for me nicely.

Spywareblaster for prevention was already mentioned above and after being updated, run to enable protection, and closed; uses no system resources at all. That's one you want for sure.


Jim.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
All in all, I think the OP, scheibler1, has received excellent advice from a diversity of viewpoints. What is now lacking is a reply from the OP to see if any of that advice has taken root. Although the advice freely given is but a single step in a longer journey, some OP feedback would be appreciated.
 

law9933

Senior member
Sep 11, 2006
394
0
0
"feedback would be appreciated"
Very true, who likes to help no one (never came back). But you can also be helping many surfers also.
I like to know the results of info that is given. I am learning also.