So is IB-E as good as cancelled then or... what?

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Maximilian, Jul 24, 2012.

  1. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,579
    Likes Received:
    5
    I read it was delayed to 2h 2013, by that time haswell will have been out, possibly for quite a few months. Will intel bother making an IB-E at all or just jump straight to a haswell-E?
     
  2. EltonL

    EltonL Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    It really depends on the demand from the server markets. The thing is, IB-E would be a good stopgap, but it's clear that Haswell-E won't be using LGA2011 so it wouldn't be a very viable platform. That said, IB-E will at least offer IPC and power consumption improvements.That and a 8-core Intel chip perhaps.

    But will IB-E actually be released? Seems like no if it overlaps with Haswell. It probably would though owing to their tick/tock strategy. At the very least they can milk the X79 a bit. Perhaps a revision?
     
  3. pantsaregood

    pantsaregood Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ivy Bridge-E has never seen an official announcement to my knowledge. Ivy Bridge-EX/EP have been announced and engineering samples exist. Intel could always cancel them, but I doubt that will happen.

    The existence of Ivy Bridge-E is dependent on the demand for rebranded Ivy Bridge-EX/EP Xeons, honestly.
     
  4. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,087
    Likes Received:
    15
    There is no IB-E and no ES samples either. Next step is Haswell-E.
     
  5. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,087
    Likes Received:
    15
    #6 ShintaiDK, Jul 24, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2012
  6. pantsaregood

    pantsaregood Senior member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    0
    Intel also generally doesn't seem to care about conflicting launches.

    Westmere units were being launched until quite some time after Sandy Bridge hit.
     
  7. Arachnotronic

    Arachnotronic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,510
    Likes Received:
    45
    Not cancelled...yeesh:

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/terryu

    "Working in a logic verification group on the Ivytown project"

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jimmy-limqueco/a/20b/2b4

    "Have been working as a verification to multiple Intel NB, and IOH projects. Current responsibility is to perform verification duties on Intel's Ivytown's Integrated I/O's DFx features such as error injection, performance counters, PCIE LTSSM FPLA and others. Presently still provide consultation level of support for Intel's Crystal Beach pre-Si verification for version 3.3"

    I don't think Intel's going to spend all this time & money having people develop IVB-E just to "cancel" it.
     
  8. Rvenger

    Rvenger Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    6,292
    Likes Received:
    4

    Yeah, they will release IVB-E right before mainstream Haswell. We probably won't see Haswell-E until Q4 2013 or even Q1 2014.
     
  9. Arachnotronic

    Arachnotronic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,510
    Likes Received:
    45
    Yup. The -E chips are meant for servers, so it takes a lot more time to validate them. It isn't "lack of competition" or "Intel being greedy", it's just these things take time.
     
  10. tynopik

    tynopik Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    3
    which of course explains why socket 1366 came first
     
  11. exar333

    exar333 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    8,503
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not sure why this is so surprising. SB-E was released only 4 months before IB was originally scheduled (before it was delayed a couple months). It's the new pattern so the newest mainstream chips are available for mobile markets, and the design can be refined and validated for serves.
     
  12. tynopik

    tynopik Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    3
    but that was never the plan

    SB-E was massively delayed by problems they found

    I fail to see why a huge screw-up should now be used to justify this as 'the new norm'
     
  13. Edrick

    Edrick Golden Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Proof?
     
  14. Edrick

    Edrick Golden Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again, Proof?

    So many people make bold claims lately without any links or documentation to back it up.
     
  15. tynopik

    tynopik Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    3
  16. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,579
    Likes Received:
    5
    Sort of like socket 940 and socket AM2. Same number of pins but worlds apart.
     
  17. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,087
    Likes Received:
    15
    IB-E aint on the latest Intel roadmap for partners. And yes, the roadmap have been posted several times. Just look for it.
     
  18. Sweepr

    Sweepr Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,121
    Likes Received:
    24
    Current Intel roadmaps dont show products that will be launched H2/2013 or after. An IB-E launch after Haswell-DT could happen. Unlikely but possible. After all, Haswell-E is not coming until 2014, Romsley platform was launched in March and the desktop SB-E will EOL without competition.
     
  19. Arachnotronic

    Arachnotronic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,510
    Likes Received:
    45
    That greater-than-or-equals-to symbol next to 3960X tells you what you need to know.
     
  20. tynopik

    tynopik Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    3
    That Intel still has no clue what they're going to do?
     
  21. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,087
    Likes Received:
    15
    Yes, that we might get a 3970X speedbin update.
     
  22. BenchPress

    BenchPress Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ivy Bridge-E doesn't make any sense. Quad-core Haswell will outperform it at any workload consumers could possibly care about. More cores is useful for servers since they run many services, but enthusiast consumers are better off with higher throughput per core instead.

    So I don't expect Intel to launch a product for which there won't be any informed demand. It would just confuse people and lead to unhappy customers who wished they went with Haswell instead.
     
  23. fixbsod

    fixbsod Senior member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2012
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    0
    think i already saw confirm of 3970x on vr-zone or legitreviews. however all i saw was a 100mhz bump and then a bump of tdp as well????

     
  24. cytg111

    cytg111 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    6
    CrystalBallMoment(tm) : Indeed we will see IB-E, and thus we shall see haswell delayed. Delayed at least 6 months to make room for much appreciated Coin in intels coffers.

    Atleast, show me the money plan that makes this NOT make sense! You can trust one thing and one thing only : $$$$$$.