So if Bush wins this november.. can we recall him?

[The Stigenator]

I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.

 

[TravisT]

That's your opinion.

 

[Genx87]

no

 

[PatboyX]

we could move...

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: TravisT
That's your opinion.

Not just his...many!

 

[shiner]

Didn't pay attention in your Civics class did you?

 

[daveshel]

Originally posted by: TravisT
That's your opinion.

I didn't see any opinions in the OP, but the answer to the question I saw is no, the federal system does not have a provision for recall like some states do.

We'll just have to recall what a bad president he was for the last 4 years (THAT is an opinion).

 

[woowoo]

If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

 

[chess9]

woowoo:

Don't go hypoxic waiting for that to happen....

-Robert

 

[Garuda]

Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.

You could always move back to Bengal. The communist government there might be more to your liking.

 

[InfectedMushroom]

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

 

[Steeplerot]

I sure wouldn't want to be the poor slob who has to clean all the oil and blood off the walls of the White House basement.
What a mess I hope he doesen't get his deposit back.

 

[The Stigenator]

Originally posted by: Garuda

Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.

You could always move back to Bengal. The communist government there might be more to your liking.

totally uncalled for garuda.

More so i may be bengali, but im not from bengal. I have family there, but if you knew me u would know i wouldnt go there.. unless i needed to.

 

[dnuggett]

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

 

[Gravity]

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Bush for war crimes? I thought Kerry testified/confessed to war crimes. Is there a statute of limitations on war crimes?

 

[InfectedMushroom]

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

 

[Drakkon]

1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy

 

[EagleKeeper]

Originally posted by: Drakkon
1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy

Then what about the Adams and Roosevelt dynasties.

And I thought the Dems wanted a certain Senator from NY to run for President. That would equal more than 8 years.

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: PatboyX
we could move...

to austraila ... think of it they have fuken duckbill platypi .. they have fuken electosensitive bills that detect movement of small prey by the electric signals to their muscles... and fuken posion claws... with those little guys im pretty shure id be entertained my entire life... and i would have to have it on my conscience that my country is full of assholes who are too arrogant to admit they are wrong... and just continue their streak of death and destruction...

ohh and they have koala bears and as mitch hedberg put it so perfectly ... they are so fuken cute

 

[Drakkon]

Originally posted by: EagleKeeper

Originally posted by: Drakkon
1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy

Then what about the Adams and Roosevelt dynasties.

And I thought the Dems wanted a certain Senator from NY to run for President. That would equal more than 8 years.

Ummm adams clan had 8 years then stopped? and The rooselvelts were barely related, I meand FDR was like the 5th cousin to Teddy. Kennedy only had 2 years under his belt before his assasination...so if elected any of his kin would only total 6.

oops my bad i thought u ment kennedys son from NY, but u ment hilary. Well I'm against that %$#@% running as well as their daughter

 

[dnuggett]

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

 

[SirStev0]

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

well, lets see... destroying the environment by not upholding our environmental laws... ruining the economy... destroying our already crappy education system with that horrible no child left behind ( teaching to a test is the worst way to educate) , the deaths of all the people, iraqi and american, for no reason other then a vandetta and money... i could go on or is that enough

 

[dnuggett]

Originally posted by: SirStev0

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

well, lets see... destroying the environment by not upholding our environmental laws... ruining the economy... destroying our already crappy education system with that horrible no child left behind ( teaching to a test is the worst way to educate) , the deaths of all the people, iraqi and american, for no reason other then a vandetta and money... i could go on or is that enough

Actually that's pretty weak considering that you want to try him for a crime. There is no basis for your first three (if there was a basis they could be sufficiently argued against as a matter of policy decisions), and the last one is unprovable. Looks like you are going to have to chalk it up as a matter of disagreance with his policy.

 

[InfectedMushroom]

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

They should be held accountable for the war crimes at Abu Gharid. They should be held accountable for the abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo. They should be held accountable for the lives of the American soldiers and Iraqi civilians killed by this war.
They are ultimatly responsible since the chain of command goes all the way up.

 

[daveshel]

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: dnuggett

Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom

Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).

First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.

What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

They should be held accountable for the war crimes at Abu Gharid. They should be held accountable for the abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo. They should be held accountable for the lives of the American soldiers and Iraqi civilians killed by this war.
They are ultimatly responsible since the chain of command goes all the way up.

Above all, for agression against a soverign nation without the backing of the UN.