So if Bush wins this november.. can we recall him?

Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.
 

daveshel

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
5,453
2
81
Originally posted by: TravisT
That's your opinion. :)

I didn't see any opinions in the OP, but the answer to the question I saw is no, the federal system does not have a provision for recall like some states do.

We'll just have to recall what a bad president he was for the last 4 years (THAT is an opinion).
 

woowoo

Platinum Member
Feb 17, 2003
2,092
1
0
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.
 

Garuda

Banned
Jun 15, 2004
444
0
0
Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.

You could always move back to Bengal. The communist government there might be more to your liking.
 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
I sure wouldn't want to be the poor slob who has to clean all the oil and blood off the walls of the White House basement.
What a mess I hope he doesen't get his deposit back.
 
Oct 9, 1999
15,216
3
81
Originally posted by: Garuda
Originally posted by: TheGoodGuy
I dont remember if that is allowed on the federal level, i know teh CA state recall rules.

I am just wondering if Bush can be recalled as the president.. cause we really do not need another 4 years under him.

You could always move back to Bengal. The communist government there might be more to your liking.

totally uncalled for garuda.

More so i may be bengali, but im not from bengal. I have family there, but if you knew me u would know i wouldnt go there.. unless i needed to.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

 

Gravity

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2003
5,685
0
0
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Bush for war crimes? I thought Kerry testified/confessed to war crimes. Is there a statute of limitations on war crimes?
 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.
 

Drakkon

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
8,401
1
0
1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it :p
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy :D
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Drakkon
1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it :p
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy :D

Then what about the Adams and Roosevelt dynasties.

And I thought the Dems wanted a certain Senator from NY to run for President. That would equal more than 8 years.

 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Originally posted by: PatboyX
we could move...

to austraila ... think of it they have fuken duckbill platypi .. they have fuken electosensitive bills that detect movement of small prey by the electric signals to their muscles... and fuken posion claws... with those little guys im pretty shure id be entertained my entire life... and i would have to have it on my conscience that my country is full of assholes who are too arrogant to admit they are wrong... and just continue their streak of death and destruction...

ohh and they have koala bears and as mitch hedberg put it so perfectly ... they are so fuken cute
 

Drakkon

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
8,401
1
0
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Drakkon
1 bush + 1 bush = 8 years...bush has had their eight years in office i dont care how you look at it :p
I dunno about you guys but I don't want a monorchy :D

Then what about the Adams and Roosevelt dynasties.

And I thought the Dems wanted a certain Senator from NY to run for President. That would equal more than 8 years.

Ummm adams clan had 8 years then stopped? and The rooselvelts were barely related, I meand FDR was like the 5th cousin to Teddy. Kennedy only had 2 years under his belt before his assasination...so if elected any of his kin would only total 6.

oops my bad i thought u ment kennedys son from NY, but u ment hilary. Well I'm against that %$#@% running as well as their daughter :p
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.


What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.


What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

well, lets see... destroying the environment by not upholding our environmental laws... ruining the economy... destroying our already crappy education system with that horrible no child left behind ( teaching to a test is the worst way to educate) , the deaths of all the people, iraqi and american, for no reason other then a vandetta and money... i could go on or is that enough
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.


What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?

well, lets see... destroying the environment by not upholding our environmental laws... ruining the economy... destroying our already crappy education system with that horrible no child left behind ( teaching to a test is the worst way to educate) , the deaths of all the people, iraqi and american, for no reason other then a vandetta and money... i could go on or is that enough


Actually that's pretty weak considering that you want to try him for a crime. There is no basis for your first three (if there was a basis they could be sufficiently argued against as a matter of policy decisions), and the last one is unprovable. Looks like you are going to have to chalk it up as a matter of disagreance with his policy.
 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.


What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?


They should be held accountable for the war crimes at Abu Gharid. They should be held accountable for the abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo. They should be held accountable for the lives of the American soldiers and Iraqi civilians killed by this war.
They are ultimatly responsible since the chain of command goes all the way up.
 

daveshel

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
5,453
2
81
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
Originally posted by: woowoo
If a court determains that the prisoners in cuba are protected by the geneva convention.
Then Bush can be tried for war crimes.

Not sure if that will happen, but it raises a good question. If Bush loses the election, will there be investigations into the practices of this administration?
Personally I think there should be, and that they should be tried for war crimes (Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, etc...).


First, that is a ridiculous statement and would never happen. Second if I assume it happens and the case against them is thrown out or they are acquitted I do not think for one second that any of the political spew coming from the left would stop.

I've said it before, I would be just as angry if Gore was in office if he had done what Bush has done. I do not care who is there, they should be accountable for their actions/decissions. This administration has not been accountable.


What exactly is your argument? What exactly should they be held accountable for?


They should be held accountable for the war crimes at Abu Gharid. They should be held accountable for the abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo. They should be held accountable for the lives of the American soldiers and Iraqi civilians killed by this war.
They are ultimatly responsible since the chain of command goes all the way up.

Above all, for agression against a soverign nation without the backing of the UN.