So, I think i just proved math wrong.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: amoeba
Germy, don't jump on the guy man. I mean he did exhibit a bit of hubris in his statement, but its not wrong to question proven things. Thats how new things are discovered.

while germy was being an asshole. he is correct.

Meh. I find it extremely hard to believe that his hyperbolic title was of actual substance. Of course, if he actually being serious, then I stand corrected.
 

amoeba

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2003
3,162
1
0
yes, most likely it was to get people to read the thread which many of us can be guilty of.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: OOBradm
GL or Savij - either way, the answer is still not exactly 1. Which means there is a core inconsistancy in math.

rolleye.gif
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: amoeba
no its not a rounding issue. You have missed the point of calculus. dx/dt is constantly changing. Thus in that 1 minute, dx/dt is not always 1200cm/min. dx/dt is merely 1200cm/min at the point at which the cube is 20 by 20 by 20.

edit: dx/dt is merely 1cm/min.

:beer:
 

Dissipate

Diamond Member
Jan 17, 2004
6,815
0
0
You won't find inconsistencies in math in Calculus. You will find some in set theory however. :D
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Well, there are some technical inconsistancies in calculus, namely that instantaneous rates of change cannot be measured or observed, but that's not important outside of philosophy. ;)

ZV
 

OOBradm

Golden Member
May 21, 2001
1,730
1
76
Thanks to the guys who stood up for me in this thread.

And yes, the title of the thread was asking for some flaming - but...

I knew i couldnt be right, as there have been people much smarter than I using calculus for milleniums, and they would know better than I. I just needed some clarification because i couldnt figure out for myself WHY i was wrong.And i got that within the first 10 posts. So, thanks again for the help, and some of you need to chill a little and relax.