I don't know anyone who has had a bad experience.....
The easiest would be to use your normal banking institution where your checking account is. Otherwise Capital One works.
I've been reading secured credit cards are about the only way for me to start. Anyone have suggestions on one to use or who to go with?
I can't seem to find anyone who has had a good experience...
I applied and was accepted for a discover card roughly one year ago with no credit history at age 24. Similar to you, I simply wanted to start a credit history and increase my score. Before the statement date, I pay off a portion of my balance so utilization is ~10% or lower. As soon as the statement is issued I pay it off completely. My credit limit was fairly low ($500), but I requested an increase after 7 months and was bumped to $1500 which definitely helps with the utilization aspect.
Discover now includes FICO score (from Transunion, I believe) on the monthly statements, and mine is slightly over 720. I still only have the one card with no other loans/mortgages/cards and have I think 4 hard pulls: one for the credit increase and three when I was first applying for cards.
Oh yeah, my APR sucks, but I don't plan on paying interest.
Yeah, I'm just trying to get a good credit history for when I buy a house. I figure 25%+ down on the house, a good credit history, and a nice paying job should be able to let me get the lowest possible fixed mortgage rate. But, maybe it won't...
If you get a card, PAY IT OFF when you get the statement every month.
Don't get in the habit of keeping even a small balance on it as there is no long-term benefit to doing so. Some people say your score will be better if you do, but that's a bunch of bull crap.
Sorry, this is false. Having open credit that does not report a high balance (different than limit and current balance), why would you be more credit worthy for a house than someone who from time to time carries balances?
Not only does it factor into the score, but from a practical standpoint, how have you proven to me as an underwriter that you have the ability to pay back money that you borrowed, since I cannot see that you do actually use the card between reporting periods?
If I borrow over the course of the month, and pay it off entirely the next month when the bill arrives, and repeat that process over and over, then that should prove I very well am trustworthy to pay my debts. Actually, it does, given how good my credit score is.
There certainly is record of the card being used. You don't have to carry a balance for that. Not sure where you got the idea that they cannot see that you use a card if you don't carry the balance. They have record of every single transaction you make.
So, no, you absolutely do not have to carry a balance and pay interest on your purchases to have a good credit score. They WANT you to carry a balance and pay interest as that benefits them, but there is no reason to from the cardholder's standpoint. Carrying a balance and paying interest just raises your costs. Why would you want to pay more than the asking price for everything?
Sorry, this is false. Having open credit that does not report a high balance (different than limit and current balance), why would you be more credit worthy for a house than someone who from time to time carries balances?
Not only does it factor into the score, but from a practical standpoint, how have you proven to me as an underwriter that you have the ability to pay back money that you borrowed, since I cannot see that you do actually use the card between reporting periods?
Edit: In reality this is taken care of when you get a car or some other installment loan that shows you have the willingness to repay debts, I was being very specific as far as correcting your statement![]()
What I do involves determining creditworthiness. Believe me, if Bank of America reports to Transunion/Equifax/Experian that you have a zero balance at the end of every month, then nobody else has any idea what you do between cycles.
I'm not advocating paying interest or carrying a balance intentionally. In the real world people carry debt, so they don't have to actually try. Rich people carry even more debt.
In the world of ATOT, I know nobody has to stoop to that level.
If I borrow over the course of the month, and pay it off entirely the next month when the bill arrives, and repeat that process over and over, then that should prove I very well am trustworthy to pay my debts. Actually, it does, given how good my credit score is.
There certainly is record of the card being used. You don't have to carry a balance for that. Not sure where you got the idea that they cannot see that you use a card if you don't carry the balance. They have record of every single transaction you make.
So, no, you absolutely do not have to carry a balance and pay interest on your purchases to have a good credit score. They WANT you to carry a balance and pay interest as that benefits them, but there is no reason to from the cardholder's standpoint. Carrying a balance and paying interest just raises your costs. Why would you want to pay more than the asking price for everything?
What I do involves determining creditworthiness. Believe me, if Bank of America reports to Transunion/Equifax/Experian that you have a zero balance at the end of every month, then nobody else has any idea what you do between cycles.
I'm not advocating paying interest or carrying a balance intentionally. In the real world people carry debt, so they don't have to actually try. Rich people carry even more debt.
In the world of ATOT, I know nobody has to stoop to that level.
