So how does AMD pull this one through?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,628
7,812
136
Intel problems a fair bit more multi-faceted than just "can't execute in CPUs".
AMD was a bit further along in the spin off the fabs game which is Intel's main problem. And Intel may get away with a better WSA if they can get some schmucks in the federal government to invest in it.
 

Asterox

Golden Member
May 15, 2012
1,058
1,864
136
Hmm, nah. Zen turned things around enough even on GF/Samsung.
Samsung/GF 14nm manufacturing process turned out to be very good = ideal for AMD at that time. There are no major complaints, except that it is not for high CPU frequencies.But the original Zen 1000 series CPU-s didn't make much sense above 3.8GHz anyway.

Finally while we're here, today's estimated current market value of Intel vs AMD.


Intel, $110 billion
AMD, $272 billion



 

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,939
190
106
AMD made a crazy epic comeback when I thought they were going to be sunk in 5 years around the time this thread started.
The Radeon division is doing poorly though with only 10% market share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and marees

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
4,763
4,324
106
Radeon is doing decent in DC though compared to gaming.
 
Last edited:

marees

Golden Member
Apr 28, 2024
1,863
2,483
96
Radeon is doing decent. Period.

Also, DC products aren't Radeon. Those are Instinct.
I think steam surveys show a poor picture for Radeon (client cards)

But if you bring console & apus into picture then a turnaround has started there too

They just need to get chiplets working with RDNA 6 or RDNA 7
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,403
10,164
106
I think steam surveys show a poor picture for Radeon (client cards)
You need to look at channel numbers and ASPs instead.
RDNA4 is doing well in the market.
They just need to get chiplets working with RDNA 6 or RDNA 7
You do understand that tiled gfx is a win more deal?
I.e. it allows you to ship $4k configs, but not much else besides that.
 

marees

Golden Member
Apr 28, 2024
1,863
2,483
96
You need to look at channel numbers and ASPs instead.
RDNA4 is doing well in the market.

You do understand that tiled gfx is a win more deal?
I.e. it allows you to ship $4k configs, but not much else besides that.
I'd expect chiplet stuff can be used to service the $1000+ stuff
 

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,145
3,614
136
Tiles are for going at least >2x total reticle in Si.
Isn't that a result of all the HBM stacks though?

Wassat nau, 8 stacks per package?

GPUs with package external (GDDR/LPDDR/DDR) memory should take up less area that that.
 

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
This 👆

I've had my 9060 XT for 2.5 months and haven't even touched my games yet, at least not any on Steam.

My dad has had the 6800XT I bought and never used since July 2023.

Pretty sure he's never once played a game with it either.
So RDNA GPU are popular amongst the “gamers that don’t game” crowd. I see.
 

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,145
3,614
136
So RDNA GPU are popular amongst the “gamers that don’t game” crowd. I see.
In my dads case it was just replacing his RX 390 that sounded like a jet engine even in idle (which considering his PC sits in the living room isn't ideal).

The 6800 XT was a huge upgrade in both raw gfx power and idle/load nosie.

In my case I mainly upgraded for the improved RT acceleration in Blender Cycles, hence my HIP RT obsession.

I used to game so much that it was unhealthy 15 years ago - but after I ended up with some kind of undiagnosed vision defect it became basically impossible to play 1st person games without suffering crippling headaches, and eventually I even became tired of console emulators and the RPGs like Diablo that I used to play for hours on end 😭

ngl I used to laugh at the thought of ennui, but it's real for me these days.
 

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
4,145
3,614
136
The creator of that video should make an update, or continue AMD's path in the same style to this day.That would be very interesting no doubt. :grinning:

Now i remember, this old Zen trailer also had very good reviews.:smirkcat:

To be fair Intel's 10nm pratfall, tying their µArch design to internal fab nodes and TSMC's relentless forward progress may have had no small part in it, but AMD have most certainly successfully turned the x86 CPU game around in their favour, and are likely to continue doing so.

The GPU end of things is what I worry far more about these days.

Between nVidia muddying the waters with progressively more ML based perf augmentation in every new generation and nVidia's propensity to turn the tables over to keep AMD from gaining any long term advantage and their long, long dominance of the Khronos open side of things through Neil Trevett.... AMD have to execute their roadmap basically perfectly to take any significant percentage of market share in the consumer GPU side of things.

DC/AI/HPC wise with CDNA it seems like things might be turning around for them though, their execution at least on the hardware side has been stellar, and they have been slowly chipping away at the software problem too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97