Sniper Ghost warrior 3 beta benchmarks

[Head1985]

Only reference cards because pcgameshardware didnt test it.Maybe later.
So expect results of 980Ti at 1050mhz,GTX1070 at 1900mhz and GTX980 at 1250Mhz.
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/sniper-ghost-warrior-3-beta-test-gpu

here is test scene 2560x1440 very high
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5uMS3C9xXw

i test it with GTX1070 at 1860Mhz and it was little bit slower with results:
Min: 53fps
Avg: 56.8fps
Max: 62fps
so their 1070 must really run at 1900mhz

Be free to post your results.Especially with GTX980TI OC at 1500/8000 or GTX1080 OC.

Here is GTX1070 oc to max 2126/9500
Min: 62fps
Avg: 65.6fps
Max: 71fps

 

[psolord]

It says registration closed!

 

[happy medium]

 

[Bacon1]

Uhhhh what??? There is no way those results are valid. i7 6700 @ 36/41 and 5960x @ 103/110???

 

[moonbogg]

The i3 is beating the 6700k. I doubt that's valid. Either that, or the game is seriously borked somehow.

 

[PhonakV30]

I really don't know what GameGPU is doing.
Look at this :
http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Sniper_Ghost_Warrior_3_Beta_/sn3_1920.png
GTX 1060 = 62,66 , RX 480 = 57,68
yet 66 is above 68 !
now for Resulotion 2560x1440 :
http://gamegpu.com/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Sniper_Ghost_Warrior_3_Beta_/sn3_2560.png
GTX 1060 = 39,43 , RX 480 = 39,46
Yes RX480 is slower than GTX 1060!!

 

[Hitman928]

They rank by minimum frame rates and do so to a higher accuracy than shown in the charts. So even though at 1440p they have the same minimum on the graph, the 1060 had the actual higher minimum (e.g. 39.3 vs 39.2). It's not a good way to do it, but that's how the way they've chosen.

 

[Bacon1]

They rank by minimum frame rates and do so to a higher accuracy than shown in the charts. So even though at 1440p they have the same minimum on the graph, the 1060 had the actual higher minimum (e.g. 39.3 vs 39.2). It's not a good way to do it, but that's how the way they've chosen.

Yep, and the length of the bar is min+avg as well instead of having the minimum take up part of the avg graph length... Also I think they keep the ordering the same for higher graphs, not even just the precision.. but maybe they've changed it. I'd like to know what was up with their CPU testing as that looks 100% wrong.

 

[happy medium]

funny the cpu scores are all over the place but the gpu scores are in line with the normal trend.

 

[poofyhairguy]

funny the cpu scores are all over the place but the gpu scores are in line with the normal trend.

It is weird that Crossfire/SLI seems broken except for the 290, where the Crossfire setup beats the single card one.

 

[Bacon1]

It is weird that Crossfire/SLI seems broken except for the 290, where the Crossfire setup beats the single card one.

Probably typo, supposed to be 290x CFX?