• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sniper Ghost warrior 3 beta benchmarks

Head1985

Golden Member
Only reference cards because pcgameshardware didnt test it.Maybe later.
So expect results of 980Ti at 1050mhz,GTX1070 at 1900mhz and GTX980 at 1250Mhz.
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/sniper-ghost-warrior-3-beta-test-gpu
sn3_2560.png


here is test scene 2560x1440 very high
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5uMS3C9xXw

i test it with GTX1070 at 1860Mhz and it was little bit slower with results:
Min: 53fps
Avg: 56.8fps
Max: 62fps
so their 1070 must really run at 1900mhz

Be free to post your results.Especially with GTX980TI OC at 1500/8000 or GTX1080 OC.

Here is GTX1070 oc to max 2126/9500
Min: 62fps
Avg: 65.6fps
Max: 71fps
 
They rank by minimum frame rates and do so to a higher accuracy than shown in the charts. So even though at 1440p they have the same minimum on the graph, the 1060 had the actual higher minimum (e.g. 39.3 vs 39.2). It's not a good way to do it, but that's how the way they've chosen.
 
They rank by minimum frame rates and do so to a higher accuracy than shown in the charts. So even though at 1440p they have the same minimum on the graph, the 1060 had the actual higher minimum (e.g. 39.3 vs 39.2). It's not a good way to do it, but that's how the way they've chosen.

Yep, and the length of the bar is min+avg as well instead of having the minimum take up part of the avg graph length... Also I think they keep the ordering the same for higher graphs, not even just the precision.. but maybe they've changed it. I'd like to know what was up with their CPU testing as that looks 100% wrong.
 
Back
Top