Just bought a new PC (dudes, I got a dell) and am amazed at the 3D Marks its posting.
Amazed at how low they are that is!
System specs:
P4 2.25 Intel 512 cache
Maxtor 40gig, 7200RPM
Intel 850E chipset
Ti2100 64mb
512 mb Samsung RDRAM
With everything stock and OCing the Geforce 3 to 225/480 my 3DMark 2001 is 8140, compared to Mad Onion's database average of over 8200 for systems using the Ti 200. Running the bench several times (including reboots) verified this is about all the juice my Dell's got.
My processor, memory (RDRAM 40ns, CL2), chipset (850E) and bus (533FSB) are about as fast as they make 'em right now. My processor is within 5-10% of the best, and I'm overclocking at roughly the type of levels I see posted on Anandtech.
My question: is my rig getting smoked 'cos I'm running a stock system when everyone else in osting using tricked up systems, or is the DBSM guy for 3D Mark smoking onions?
PS: Don't flame me for getting a Dell. My IQ is as low as my spare time.
Amazed at how low they are that is!
System specs:
P4 2.25 Intel 512 cache
Maxtor 40gig, 7200RPM
Intel 850E chipset
Ti2100 64mb
512 mb Samsung RDRAM
With everything stock and OCing the Geforce 3 to 225/480 my 3DMark 2001 is 8140, compared to Mad Onion's database average of over 8200 for systems using the Ti 200. Running the bench several times (including reboots) verified this is about all the juice my Dell's got.
My processor, memory (RDRAM 40ns, CL2), chipset (850E) and bus (533FSB) are about as fast as they make 'em right now. My processor is within 5-10% of the best, and I'm overclocking at roughly the type of levels I see posted on Anandtech.
My question: is my rig getting smoked 'cos I'm running a stock system when everyone else in osting using tricked up systems, or is the DBSM guy for 3D Mark smoking onions?
PS: Don't flame me for getting a Dell. My IQ is as low as my spare time.
