Smoking, in an Economic Context (FINAL EDIT)

[ReiAyanami]

Joe Camel says its cool. Marboro Man say so too.

To ban the fa-sticks is discrimination against Joey "the terrorist" Camel and Mass Murderer Marboro. In country of this, are innocent until proven guilty.

They should be allow to bring smoky sticks into stablishment for deploying free secondhand smoke too all.

But if the one that like to huff and suck on cancer sticks can bring their carcinogens into stablishment, then everyone should be allow to bring in any carcinogen of their choice. Such as bucket of lead paint, gasoline fumes, asbestos sweater, ect...

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: chess9
Well, good luck.

I don't like the title either.

Also, I'm not sure there is any proof that not allowing smoking harms any restaurant owner. Down here it just hasn't happened. I went out several nights ago and the smokers were all in the parking lot getting a quick drag or seven before they went in. We had to wait 20 minutes for a table. But then, they didn't know who I was. j/k

It is now illegal to smoke in most restaurants in Florida, by the way.

There have been studies by both pro-tobacco and anti-tobacco orgs, from neither of which I'm willing to accept statistics. And, yes, the title sucks.