• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

small earthquake just right now, southern cali

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Yeah, we've had a few up here today too 😉

MAG DATE UTC-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION
y/m/d h:m:s deg deg km

3.0 2003/12/29 05:38:23 35.579 -120.861 0.0 14 km ( 9 mi) W of Templeton, CA
1.7 2003/12/29 05:02:03 35.544 -120.760 5.5 5 km ( 3 mi) WSW of Templeton, CA
2.3 2003/12/29 04:25:30 35.707 -121.060 4.7 14 km ( 8 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
1.7 2003/12/29 04:21:38 35.650 -121.031 6.0 12 km ( 7 mi) NNE of Cambria, CA
2.0 2003/12/29 03:54:04 35.693 -121.051 8.8 14 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.3 2003/12/29 03:36:55 35.575 -120.941 1.3 13 km ( 8 mi) E of Cambria, CA
2.2 2003/12/29 03:30:26 35.527 -120.826 0.3 11 km ( 7 mi) WSW of Templeton, CA
2.0 2003/12/29 03:19:40 35.709 -121.095 5.3 11 km ( 7 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
2.2 2003/12/29 03:13:03 35.632 -120.965 4.3 14 km ( 9 mi) SSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.5 2003/12/29 02:59:35 35.586 -120.912 0.0 16 km ( 10 mi) ENE of Cambria, CA
2.0 2003/12/29 02:56:50 35.650 -121.042 2.5 11 km ( 7 mi) NNE of Cambria, CA
1.9 2003/12/29 02:50:51 35.650 -121.065 4.4 11 km ( 7 mi) N of Cambria, CA
2.3 2003/12/29 02:43:51 35.669 -121.038 6.5 13 km ( 8 mi) NNE of Cambria, CA
2.7 2003/12/29 02:41:49 35.712 -121.032 9.0 14 km ( 9 mi) WSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.1 2003/12/29 02:40:55 35.700 -121.033 9.2 14 km ( 9 mi) WSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
3.5 2003/12/29 02:38:44 35.548 -120.963 0.0 11 km ( 7 mi) E of Cambria, CA
2.7 2003/12/29 02:35:29 35.621 -120.888 0.0 13 km ( 8 mi) S of Lake Nacimiento, CA
1.9 2003/12/29 01:40:50 35.610 -120.930 0.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.5 2003/12/29 00:59:25 35.663 -120.987 4.7 13 km ( 8 mi) SW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.0 2003/12/29 00:48:03 35.636 -120.894 3.4 11 km ( 7 mi) S of Lake Nacimiento, CA
3.2 2003/12/29 00:20:10 35.656 -121.100 2.7 8 km ( 5 mi) E of San Simeon, CA
2.2 2003/12/28 23:06:54 35.611 -120.879 7.0 14 km ( 9 mi) S of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.1 2003/12/28 23:04:19 35.706 -121.078 4.6 12 km ( 8 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
1.8 2003/12/28 22:57:26 35.627 -120.942 4.6 14 km ( 8 mi) SSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.3 2003/12/28 22:49:51 35.526 -120.821 0.0 11 km ( 7 mi) WSW of Templeton, CA
2.6 2003/12/28 21:59:14 35.674 -121.095 0.2 9 km ( 6 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
1.8 2003/12/28 20:10:03 35.697 -121.046 9.5 14 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
1.8 2003/12/28 20:09:42 35.733 -121.088 1.9 14 km ( 8 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
2.3 2003/12/28 20:05:48 35.639 -120.952 5.0 13 km ( 8 mi) SSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.2 2003/12/28 20:01:59 35.607 -120.897 7.3 15 km ( 9 mi) S of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.1 2003/12/28 19:52:51 35.609 -120.890 4.7 14 km ( 9 mi) S of Lake Nacimiento, CA
1.8 2003/12/28 19:49:28 35.711 -121.040 5.1 15 km ( 9 mi) WSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
1.9 2003/12/28 19:16:48 35.691 -121.030 9.4 14 km ( 9 mi) WSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.5 2003/12/28 18:45:14 35.666 -121.103 0.2 8 km ( 5 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.5 2003/12/28 17:52:28 35.639 -121.065 1.2 10 km ( 6 mi) NNE of Cambria, CA
2.0 2003/12/28 17:43:58 35.723 -121.095 7.5 12 km ( 8 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
2.2 2003/12/28 16:25:20 35.587 -120.830 0.0 11 km ( 7 mi) WNW of Templeton, CA
2.1 2003/12/28 15:29:11 35.701 -121.039 5.7 15 km ( 9 mi) WSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
1.6 2003/12/28 14:21:18 35.964 -120.516 7.4 10 km ( 6 mi) NW of Parkfield, CA
1.8 2003/12/28 13:20:28 35.557 -120.843 6.4 12 km ( 8 mi) W of Templeton, CA
2.5 2003/12/28 13:09:05 36.610 -120.763 0.0 23 km ( 14 mi) NNW of New Idria, CA
2.0 2003/12/28 12:53:16 35.613 -120.933 4.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSW of Lake Nacimiento, CA
2.0 2003/12/28 12:51:10 35.709 -121.083 0.0 12 km ( 8 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
1.7 2003/12/28 12:49:25 35.694 -121.041 5.0 14 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.0 2003/12/28 12:14:49 35.965 -120.514 7.4 10 km ( 6 mi) NW of Parkfield, CA
2.5 2003/12/28 11:25:32 35.661 -121.127 2.9 6 km ( 4 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.0 2003/12/28 11:05:28 35.639 -121.074 0.3 9 km ( 6 mi) N of Cambria, CA
2.1 2003/12/28 10:33:24 35.649 -121.047 4.5 11 km ( 7 mi) NNE of Cambria, CA
2.1 2003/12/28 09:55:34 35.698 -121.043 6.3 15 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.4 2003/12/28 09:46:14 35.736 -121.092 5.8 13 km ( 8 mi) NE of San Simeon, CA
1.7 2003/12/28 09:44:24 35.713 -121.052 5.1 15 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
2.2 2003/12/28 09:25:25 35.696 -121.052 4.7 14 km ( 9 mi) ENE of San Simeon, CA
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
The southern fault is building pressure, looks like a there will be a big snap just south of LA over 7.0 within the next 6 months.

12-30-2003 'Pregnant' San Andreas Could Be Ready to Deliver

Now, with the 10th anniversary of the Northridge temblor approaching, and after much study of those second-tier faults, scientists again are highlighting the San Andreas as the rupture without rival ? a slumbering beast napping on borrowed time.

Yule and his colleagues have dug trenches along the southern section of the fault to carbon-date its buried fissures in hopes of determining just how "pregnant" it is. Their best guess: The San Andreas, from the Salton Sea to San Bernardino, is at term.

 
It will be "Normal" when Southern Cal is leveled and half in the Ocean:

1-2-2004 U.S. Survey: Iran Quake and Others Normal Activity

WASHINGTON - The earthquake that killed more than 50,000 people in Iran was part of a normal pattern that included quakes in California, New Caledonia, Panama, Mexico and Indonesia in the last two weeks, the U.S. Geological Survey said on Friday.

"We are in the norm of earthquake activity," seismologist Jim Devine said in a telephone interview from the U.S. agency that monitors earthquakes. "We would need several more large earthquakes before we start considering something unusual."

Between 1890 and 1906, there were an unusually high number of large earthquakes including ones in California and Chile that were higher than 8 magnitude. By contrast, in the 1980s, "We were 'energy deficient,"' Devine said.

"We can tell you where they're likely to occur, how large they are likely to be, how often they occur and how the ground will respond around it. But we cannot tell you just when it's going to hit," he said.

 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
It will be "Normal" when Southern Cal is leveled and half in the Ocean:

1-2-2004 U.S. Survey: Iran Quake and Others Normal Activity

WASHINGTON - The earthquake that killed more than 50,000 people in Iran was part of a normal pattern that included quakes in California, New Caledonia, Panama, Mexico and Indonesia in the last two weeks, the U.S. Geological Survey said on Friday.

"We are in the norm of earthquake activity," seismologist Jim Devine said in a telephone interview from the U.S. agency that monitors earthquakes. "We would need several more large earthquakes before we start considering something unusual."

Between 1890 and 1906, there were an unusually high number of large earthquakes including ones in California and Chile that were higher than 8 magnitude. By contrast, in the 1980s, "We were 'energy deficient,"' Devine said.

"We can tell you where they're likely to occur, how large they are likely to be, how often they occur and how the ground will respond around it. But we cannot tell you just when it's going to hit," he said.

maybe i should buy myself a surfboard as there will big awesome waves hitting my apartmet
 
Originally posted by: Evadman
There have been 26 earth quakes in CA today. Looks like a normal day.

I bet that california slides into the ocean within 10 years.

Please end the misery. :brokenheart:
 
Back
Top