Originally posted by: Xenon14
Boxter, although a porsche, is not a porsche. 911 Turbo is a Porsche.
Originally posted by: biffbacon
ok, im looking at a couple of cars, and was wondering if anyone had any experience with these, or suggestions. Im looking at a Porsche Boxster, or a Mercedes SLK 230.
Any thoughts on which way I should go?
Originally posted by: Legendary
SLK 32 AMG anyone?![]()
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: biffbacon
ok, im looking at a couple of cars, and was wondering if anyone had any experience with these, or suggestions. Im looking at a Porsche Boxster, or a Mercedes SLK 230.
Any thoughts on which way I should go?
Have you driven these cars yet?
I think you may forgetting the infamous 914!!Originally posted by: conjur
pffft...911 Turbo is a sweet car but for what, 130k? Sheeet. The only Porsche that wasn't worth a damn was that lame-ass 924. Well, that and their ridiculous version of an SUV.
Originally posted by: fyleow
If I were you I'd go for the 330ci convertible instead, the 330ci is a pretty "high end" car (better than the 325i's people buy just for the tag) and IMO is better than the boxster or SLK. The SLK is definately underpowered and the Boxster just screams "wannabe" because it's the cheapest porsche.
Originally posted by: bbkat
Originally posted by: fyleow
If I were you I'd go for the 330ci convertible instead, the 330ci is a pretty "high end" car (better than the 325i's people buy just for the tag) and IMO is better than the boxster or SLK. The SLK is definately underpowered and the Boxster just screams "wannabe" because it's the cheapest porsche.
I'm going for the 330cic for a more forgiving ride on those long drives and (small) back seats for when me & my buddy pick up random hottiesIf you gotta have a roadster, the s2000 at about $10k less is no slouch. If your looking for status, go Boxster. Boxster-S if you can afford it.