• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

SLI an economical upgrade path? Doesn't look that way.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It certainly is nice to entertain the thought of a board surviving CPU and vid card upgrades. The on-die memory controller has already taken most of the performance differences traditionally attached to the chipset out of the mix and placed the emphasis on features now. So if all that was required is say a bios flash to support a newer CPU, and adding the option of newer gen SLI cards, a current sli capable board might last you 2.5yrs which would be phenomenal.
 
The problem with comparing two 5950's to two 6xxx cards is that the 5950 was a horrible piece of metal and plastic and the 6xxx was actually built to dx9 specs. Nvidia likely will not have such a jump to its next gen of cards as it had with this one.

It was a great performing card. Not the best but still better than my present FX5900XT. And two of those would perform fantastically. Anywho, I wanted to illustrate that if you had two previous gen cards running in SLI mode, you'd be pretty set for todays' games. If I had that option I wouldn't upgrade for at least another year. That's what makes SLI attractive for me.
 
Originally posted by: bigal40
Buying two of the latest graphics cards does not leave any room for upgrading so it deosn't lead to any upgrade path.
Well, that's ... confusing. An SLI-capable MB automatically gives you one more upgrade option than a single AGP-/PEG-slot MB: the ability to throw in another top-end card for truly bleeding-edge performance. And it leads to a correspondingly one-better upgrade path in the future. So I'm not sure what you meant by your post, big al.

I still think (and agree) that SLI is best used as an ultra-high-end option. Buying one mid-end card to slap another one in later just doesn't seem appealing to me, but I suppose it's OK if your monitor is limiting you to a relatively low res, or if you can do without AA. Just my opinion, though.
 
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
It certainly is nice to entertain the thought of a board surviving CPU and vid card upgrades. The on-die memory controller has already taken most of the performance differences traditionally attached to the chipset out of the mix and placed the emphasis on features now. So if all that was required is say a bios flash to support a newer CPU, and adding the option of newer gen SLI cards, a current sli capable board might last you 2.5yrs which would be phenomenal.

DDR2 will probably kill that lovely thought unfortunately. :brokenheart:
 
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I still maintain parallel/concurrent is the near future, and that the expectations of each succeeding gen. GPU being 75-100% faster than the last can't hold up much longer if they don't get around the limitations of current packaging tech and materials. Even if they are able to create that performance in a single GPU you will see longer time between releases and paper launches will edge more toward vapor launches IMHO 🙂

IMO dual-core GPUs will emerge as the standard as opposed to SLI.
 
Sample System 1:

Dimension XPS Gen4
Date & Time: December 24, 2004 11:47:52 PM

SYSTEM COMPONENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dell Dimension XPS Series - Gen 4 Pentium® 4 Processor w/ HT Tech Extreme Edition (3.46GHz, 1066 FSB) ME341H [221-7046] 1
Operating System Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional WPXP [313-7222][462-4610][412-0688][420-4838][420-4927] 11
Memory 1GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz (2x512M) 1GB5 [311-3766] 3
Video Card 256MB PCI Express? x16 Nvidia® GeForce 6800 GTO Graphics Card 256GT68 [320-4077] 6
Hard Drive FREE UPGRADE! 160GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) 160SP [463-0994] 8
Floppy Drive and Additional Storage Devices 3.5 in Floppy Drive FD [340-1927] 10
Network Interface Integrated Gigabit Ethernet IN [430-0742] 13
CD or DVD Drive Dual Drives: 16x DVD + FREE UPGRADE! 16x DVD+/-RW w/dbl layer write DV16DVP [463-4686][420-5079] 16
Sound Cards Sound Blaster Audigy? 2 ZS (D) Card w/Dolby 5.1, IEEE 1394 capability SBA2X [313-3114] 17
Limited Warranty, Services and Support Options 1Yr Ltd Warranty, 1Yr At-Home Service, and 1Yr Technical Support S111OS [950-1260][950-3337][950-9797][412-0360][960-2800] 29
XPS Specialized Support Dimension XPS, Specialized Support XPSSUPP [960-2697] 31
Tracer Skus Award Winning Service and Support XPS3SAP [463-5453] 82

ACCESSORIES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dell 720 Color Printer Qty 1
Free Dell Color Printer 720 Unit Price $0.00
Catalog Number: 29
Sort
Module Description Product Code Sku Id
Dell Color Printer 720 Free Dell Color Printer 720 FREE720 [255-0071] 1
Hardware Support Services 1Yr Ltd. Warranty , 1 yrTechnical Support , 1 yr Advance Exchange AE1YR [902-7040][960-4638][960-2840] 29


TOTAL: $2,998.00
Lets assume you get a delff coupon for 20% off which would make it $2998.00-$599.60=$2398.40



Sample System 2:

Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS $86.00 (After $25.00 rebate)
Gamer Limited Edition Retail

CoolerMaster PAC-T01-EK Praetorian $115.99
Aluminium Mid Tower Case (Black) Retail

NEC 16X Double Layer DVD±RW Drive, $67.00
Black, Model ND-3500A BK, OEM

Lite-On 16X DVD-ROM, Model SOHD-167T $29.00
Black, RETAIL

NEC 1.44MB Black Internal Floppy Drive, OEM $9.99

OCZ PowerStream 520W Power Supply $139.00
OCZ520ADJ - 520W

Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 ST3160827AS $112.00
160GB Serial ATA 7200RPM Hard Drive
w/8MB Buffer

Asus A8N-SLI DELUXE Socket 939/nForce4/ $213.66
PCI-Express/RAID/2GBE/ATX Motherboard


Corsair Value Select (Dual Pack) 184 Pin $144.96
512MBx2 DDR PC-3200

AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 2.2 GHz, 512KB L2 $317.00
Cache 64-bit Socket 939 Processor - Retail

BFG 6800GT PCIE X2 $800.00

Windows XP PRO OEM W/SP2 $143.00


TOTAL: $2177.60 (includes tax and shipping)
(Over $200.00 less than Dell)

Which system would you rather have? BTW the second system is the one I am currently building.

I purchase a brand new system every 4-5 years and between new systems I will do upgrades (i.e. video card, sound card, monitor, speaker, etc.). I usually spend about $2k when I do purchase a brand new system like I am doing currently.

The point I am trying to make here is that I don't understand why people are trying to shoot down the idea of buiding an SLI system by saying it costs too much because the technology is too new. Any high-end system that you build at any given time will cost you money regardless of the current techonology available. The reason I used the 2 sytems above as an example is to show you that if I were to go to Dell to build my high-end system not only would I pay more, I wouldn't even get SLI.

SLI tecnology currently costs a little more but for a guy like me that will keep a computer for 5 years and upgrade components along the way it is well worth the money.






 
Sickbeast,
SLI is not supposed to be a "standard". It's not replacing anything. It's merely the latest and greatest in the high end PC market. You won't be "forced" into buying it. Just get yourself a single card system when you're ready to upgrade and leave the SLI stuff to the people that want it.
 
Really will have to wait until sli is available in any real numbers. At that point, price should drop a little anyways. Still really just a paper launch.
 
Which system would you rather have? BTW the second system is the one I am currently building.

Uh, ever heard of a strawman?

You priced out a Dell system with the fastest P4EE processor (about, oh, $1100 by itself), using DDR2 (which costs more than DDR). And Dell gouges mercilessly on any sort of upgrade from their base models, and on top of that you're unlikely to get as good a case/PSU/memory/hard drive. Of course it costs more than a self-built AMD system using a more sanely-priced processor. This does not prove anything useful, other than that Dell is not a good choice for value in high-end gaming systems, and that the P4EE is a huge ripoff compared to a regular P4 or A64 processor. Price out a system from Newegg with the exact same specs as that Dell (don't forget the printer) and see what it comes out to. I'm guessing it's a tad more than $2200.

Edit: I quickly priced a more reasonable Dell configuration. The 8400 with P4E 3.4Ghz, 1GB of dual-channel DDR2, 160GB SATA drive, DVD-ROM and DVD+-RW, Audigy 2, X800XT (a better deal than the 6800GTO given their upgrade prices), printer, and 3-year warranty is $1800 (without monitor, and including 10% already taken off for a 'normal' sale, and with free 2-day shipping; you could theoretically stack other savings on top of that). If you subtract $400 from your second system for the second 6800GT, the price is just about identical -- but I *know* you can beat Dell's price on this by a good bit if you shop around and build it yourself.

In your second config, if you subbed out the A8N-SLI for the Chaintech NF4 board ($120), and the 520W Powerstream for an Antec 430W TruePower ($70), the system costs $160 less, which, BTW, is a good chunk of the difference between a PCIe 6600GT ($180) and a 6800GT ($400). Certainly dropping to a 3200+ processor instead of a 3500+ would fill the rest of the gap.

Basically, right now, in terms of using SLI as an upgrade path, you're paying a ~$150 premium (between the more expensive motherboard and PSU) in the hopes that a) the next-gen cards won't be that much faster than the current-gen ones (a 6800GT SLI is about 75% faster than a single 6800GT, for comparison), and b) the prices on the current-gen cards will drop significantly by the time you want to upgrade. If a year from now a 6800GT still costs, say, $300-350, buying one is probably not going to be a very attractive upgrade path (if the prices plummet, then obviously this becomes much more attractive, but I don't think this will happen quickly given the supply problems so far). If you intend to keep the 6800GT for 3-4 years before upgrading, the upgrade price will likely be much better -- but a 6800GT SLI is likely not going to be competitive in performance and features with single cards 3 years from now (since by 2007 you'd probably be looking at DX10-class hardware in new cards).

I also think that we're more likely to see a move towards multi-GPU cards (and/or multi-core GPUs) in the future rather than SLI. You're replicating a lot of hardware between the two cards; a single card with two (or more) smaller (and possibly multicore) GPUs is a more cost-effective way to get more pipelines.

As i said before, just buy the Sli setup and the ONE card you want to run your current games NOW. THEN - when your games slow down - you have the OPTION(s) to 1) Sell your card and buy another single card or 2) add a second card for SLI.

I don't think i can explain it any easier.

To me, the extra $50 for the sli MB is no big deal to preserve my upgrade option.

$50 is a lot more reasonable than $150-200 (although still not insignificant if you're on, say, a $750-1000 budget), but unless you already have a high-wattage good-quality PSU, you have to take the PSU pricing differences into account. I don't know how soon the price differences on the motherboards will get closer (or what the street prices will eventually settle at). It may reach a $50 difference eventually, but right now it's about $100 (it's actually more on newegg; the A8N is up to over $250). Unless someone releases a 'value' SLI board (ie, not with onboard everything), I think you'll be looking at a ~$200 street price on SLI boards for a while.

Look. My point is just that, if you're in the market for a new system, you should realize that SLI *might* turn out to not be a cost-effective upgrade choice in the future, and you're paying a premium for it now. Don't come back whining in a year when the best bang/buck you can get is to sell your 6800GT and buy a single NV50/R500, and you realize you wasted your money on a super-high-wattage PSU and NF4 SLI board. Of course, in a year the prices on the PCIe NV4Xs could also plummet, and then I'll look like an idiot. 😛 But you're essentially making a wager on future prices if you buy SLI intending to use it as an upgrade option, and it might not pay off.

PS: Merry Christmas! 🙂:beer:
 
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Which system would you rather have? BTW the second system is the one I am currently building.

Uh, ever heard of a strawman?

You priced out a Dell system with the fastest P4EE processor (about, oh, $1100 by itself), using DDR2 (which costs more than DDR). And Dell gouges mercilessly on any sort of upgrade from their base models, and on top of that you're unlikely to get as good a case/PSU/memory/hard drive. Of course it costs more than a self-built AMD system using a more sanely-priced processor. This does not prove anything useful, other than that Dell is not a good choice for value in high-end gaming systems, and that the P4EE is a huge ripoff compared to a regular P4 or A64 processor. Price out a system from Newegg with the exact same specs as that Dell (don't forget the printer) and see what it comes out to. I'm guessing it's a tad more than $2200.

In your second config, if you subbed out the A8N-SLI for the Chaintech NF4 board ($120), and the 520W Powerstream for an Antec 430W TruePower ($70), the system costs $160 less, which, BTW, is a good chunk of the difference between a PCIe 6600GT ($180) and a 6800GT ($400). Certainly dropping to a 3200+ processor instead of a 3500+ would fill the rest of the gap.

Basically, right now, in terms of using SLI as an upgrade path, you're paying a ~$150 premium (between the more expensive motherboard and PSU) in the hopes that a) the next-gen cards won't be that much faster than the current-gen ones (a 6800GT SLI is about 75% faster than a single 6800GT, for comparison), and b) the prices on the current-gen cards will drop significantly by the time you want to upgrade. If a year from now a 6800GT still costs, say, $300-350, buying one is probably not going to be a very attractive upgrade path (if the prices plummet, then obviously this becomes much more attractive, but I don't think this will happen quickly given the supply problems so far). If you intend to keep the 6800GT for 3-4 years before upgrading, the upgrade price will likely be much better -- but a 6800GT SLI is likely not going to be competitive in performance and features with single cards 3 years from now (since by 2007 you'd probably be looking at DX10-class hardware in new cards).

I also think that we're more likely to see a move towards multi-GPU cards (and/or multi-core GPUs) in the future rather than SLI. You're replicating a lot of hardware between the two cards; a single card with two (or more) smaller (and possibly multicore) GPUs is a more cost-effective way to get more pipelines.

As i said before, just buy the Sli setup and the ONE card you want to run your current games NOW. THEN - when your games slow down - you have the OPTION(s) to 1) Sell your card and buy another single card or 2) add a second card for SLI.

I don't think i can explain it any easier.

To me, the extra $50 for the sli MB is no big deal to preserve my upgrade option.

$50 is a lot more reasonable than $150-200 (although still not insignificant if you're on, say, a $750-1000 budget), but unless you already have a high-wattage good-quality PSU, you have to take the PSU pricing differences into account. I don't know how soon the price differences on the motherboards will get closer (or what the street prices will eventually settle at). It may reach a $50 difference eventually, but right now it's about $100 (it's actually more on newegg; the A8N is up to over $250). Unless someone releases a 'value' SLI board (ie, not with onboard everything), I think you'll be looking at a ~$200 street price on SLI boards for a while.

Look. My point is just that, if you're in the market for a new system, you should realize that SLI *might* turn out to not be a cost-effective upgrade choice in the future, and you're paying a premium for it now. Don't come back whining in a year when the best bang/buck you can get is to sell your 6800GT and buy a single NV50/R500, and you realize you wasted your money on a super-high-wattage PSU and NF4 SLI board. Of course, in a year the prices on the PCIe NV4Xs could also plummet, and then I'll look like an idiot. 😛 But you're essentially making a wager on future prices if you buy SLI intending to use it as an upgrade option, and it might not pay off.

PS: Merry Christmas! 🙂:beer:

I think I will go and kick the cat.

 
Back
Top