Am I the only person who thinks this ISN'T a good idea?
(Couldn't decide whether to put this in Games, P&N or OT...)
(Couldn't decide whether to put this in Games, P&N or OT...)
Originally posted by: Looney
Why exactly is this a bad idea? There has been games and movies based on war events in the past you know, even unsuccessful ones like Blackhawk Down.
God you're a moron.
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: Looney
Why exactly is this a bad idea? There has been games and movies based on war events in the past you know, even unsuccessful ones like Blackhawk Down.
God you're a moron.
Thanks, I love you too. I swear I didn't end up posting this in P&N...
Originally posted by: Billyzeke
I don't see a anything wrong with it. I just hope its a good game. On a slightly related subject: Why is it that no one can make a good fps set in vietnam?
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: Looney
Why exactly is this a bad idea? There has been games and movies based on war events in the past you know, even unsuccessful ones like Blackhawk Down.
God you're a moron.
Thanks, I love you too. I swear I didn't end up posting this in P&N...
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: Looney
Why exactly is this a bad idea? There has been games and movies based on war events in the past you know, even unsuccessful ones like Blackhawk Down.
God you're a moron.
Thanks, I love you too. I swear I didn't end up posting this in P&N...
Well his name is Looney...
It's a questionable idea at least from a PR standpoint since we still have soldiers dying in Iraq. WWII theater games there's a certain detachment and 60+ years of reconciliation. That said, if there's a mission to pull Saddam out of a rabbit hole, I'm in!
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
If you are put off by this idea then you should feel the same about the dozen+ of WWII games that are far worse by default.
Originally posted by: ZzZGuy
I drawing blanks on why this would be a bad idea, perhaps the OP could provide some examples?
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I guess that's why CoD 4 always referred to "a country in the middle east" or simply "the middle east" during the missions, though the cutscenes zoom in on maps that reveal you're in Saudi Arabia.
Originally posted by: Bob Ghengis Khan
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I guess that's why CoD 4 always referred to "a country in the middle east" or simply "the middle east" during the missions, though the cutscenes zoom in on maps that reveal you're in Saudi Arabia.
I thought COD4 takes place in Azerbaijan, which is a real Middle East nation (but they have the location wrong)
Originally posted by: AmberClad
There already is an FPS with missions based on actual events in the Iraq War, including ones from Fallujah. Kuma War
Originally posted by: Oakenfold
Originally posted by: AmberClad
There already is an FPS with missions based on actual events in the Iraq War, including ones from Fallujah. Kuma War
Has Kuma improved? I tried it once a long long time ago and lost interest about 30 seconds after the install completed.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
If you are put off by this idea then you should feel the same about the dozen+ of WWII games that are far worse by default.
I think the nature of representing an ongoing war as entertainment is the issue, and OP is hardly alone if he thinks it might prove controversial.
http://www.gamepolitics.com/20...tsix-days-fallujahquot
Surely you can at least see some difference in perception among even non-gamers about a game depicting the Napoleonic Wars vs a current conflict in which people are still dying?
As to WWII, there are plenty of people who object to making games out of that too.
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Game's been nixed apparently.