Site 1 or 2?

xanis

Lifer
Sep 11, 2005
17,571
8
0
Neither are that fantastic IMO but 2 feels like it works better than 1.
 

Dirigible

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2006
5,961
32
91
Originally posted by: Xanis
Neither are that fantastic IMO but 2 feels like it works better than 1.

If I had to choose, I would choose 2. I don't like either one much, though.
 

hanoverphist

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2006
9,867
23
76
Originally posted by: Dirigible
Originally posted by: Xanis
Neither are that fantastic IMO but 2 feels like it works better than 1.

If I had to choose, I would choose 2. I don't like either one much, though.

ya they both feel like the old aol personal pages. number 1 gets extra points for those 90s-tastic buttons tho!
 

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,916
0
0
Originally posted by: George P Burdell
2 > 1, but both look like they're from the 90's

Agreed, also using logo and button maker pro for windows 95. :)
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,340
10,859
136
Neither? ;)

If I have to choose I'd also say #2, but get to work on #3 asap!
 

911paramedic

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
9,448
1
76
I had to check the source code to make sure they weren't made with FrontPage 1.0.

A sign company? You could get SO creative with a site like that if you wanted to.

P.S. Be careful with those designs, when you turn off styles all you see is " Bellmount Signs & Graphics", nothing else.
 

NanoStuff

Banned
Mar 23, 2006
2,981
1
0
Originally posted by: 911paramedic
I had to check the source code to make sure they weren't made with FrontPage 1.0.

Don't be silly. And if one can make a properly functional site with FP, so what? That doesn't tend to happen, but whatever works.

It's hard to get creative when there's nothing to put on the site :) I could put a bunch of frills and ribbons all around, but that would get very silly very fast.