SiSoft Leaks AMD FX "Zambezi" Scores: Worse Than Intel Core i7

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,782
24
81
If AMD scores a trifecta with all 3 new console architectures(Nintendo Wii U, Sony Playstation 4 and Microsoft XBOX 720), as rumored, it will definitely have paid off in the acquisition of ATI.

They will have bet the future on Fusion and won!
 

BlueBlazer

Senior member
Nov 25, 2008
555
0
76
It was definitely a cherry deal for ATI's shareholders.

Anytime you manage to sell high, that is going to mean someone else is buying high.

AMD's M&A activity though is questionable, they seem to find themselves buying high and selling low.

Qualcomm laughed all the way to the bank on AMD's dime as well.

The sad part is that so did Hector :(
Remember former ATI CEO, Dave Orton, that left after the acquisition? :hmm:
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Corporate ethics thing with me, I'm the guy that will drive across town to avoid going into a Wal-Mart.


You must lead a tough life. How do you buy gasoline, given your disdain for bad corp. ethics? Or buy almost anything? Have yet to see many corp. entities that are truly altruistic or even close to being warm hearted. Outside Newman's Own, not many out there.
 

Majic 7

Senior member
Mar 27, 2008
668
0
0
You must lead a tough life. How do you buy gasoline, given your disdain for bad corp. ethics? Or buy almost anything? Have yet to see many corp. entities that are truly altruistic or even close to being warm hearted. Outside Newman's Own, not many out there.
+1
Not sure what world some people think they live in. Corruption and kickbacks are so institutionalized in this world people don't even realize what they are looking at. I remember a newscast from years ago. Bubble brain junior reporter doing a filler for our tax dollars at work. Standing by a new bus stop, regular three sided glass enclosure with a roof and a bench. Commenting on how it cost 100,000$ like that was perfectly normal. This is when you could buy a new four bedroom house for that amount of money. Saw a supposed quote from some CEO that he does something indictable at least once a week. Wouldn't surprise me. Anyone who wants to avoid evil corporations is going to end up in the wilds, naked and wielding a pointy stick.
 
Last edited:

Arzachel

Senior member
Apr 7, 2011
903
76
91
All this talk about BD having lower IPC than Llano and even Bobcat reminded me of something from the old thread:

Hans de Vries said:
JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
.....}
until (interrupt by Movieman)

Regards, Hans

BD is on its way to getting negative IPC! :D
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
Hint: "IPC" = instructions per clock. With a 8 little cores working in parallel, you can increase IPC over six core Stars even if the per-core performance is lower ;)
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,362
136
Hotchips August 2010

Mike Butler, AMD Fellow and Chief Architect of Bulldozer

We never lost sight of the importance of single threaded execution

BulldozerHotChips_August24_8pmET_NDA-16_575px.jpg
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
The thing is : terrace guy posted waay too much!

Thats from your perspective . He was just countering your and others over hype he was balance. You got alot of people banned at XS.over the last 6 years YOUR PH I hype was the same.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Fusion... that's the only big reason why AMD acquired ATI. As you can see, it's definitely paying off now, even if it's five years later. AMD has sold around 12 million APUs in less than a year.

As far as architectures go, you're definitely right. AMD is still using a 2003 architecture in 2011. Given that, if Bulldozer has made no improvements on it, it'll suck from day one.

I defended the ATI purchase for a long time based on Fusion. Personally, however, I am somewhat disappointed in Fusion, especially on the desktop. I guess I thought originally that when fusion came out it would have an improved CPU architecture as well. Anyway, if I were buying a notebook, I would definitely look at an AMD APU system. On the desktop, however, I dont think the integrated graphics is strong enough to make up for the mediocre CPU performance. Just get an intel CPU or even an AMD quad without the APU, and add a discrete card. Or if you are not interested in gaming, the HD2000 on the Sandy Bridge CPUs is sufficient for most purposes.

I dont know the sales figures for Fusion, so I assume you are correct that they are selling well. Just dont know if they are making much profit on such low end products.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Hint: "IPC" = instructions per clock. With a 8 little cores working in parallel, you can increase IPC over six core Stars even if the per-core performance is lower ;)

That's not the traditional use or meaning of the term IPC.

It would be wholely disingenuous to redefine IPC at this juncture to be an "at the socket level" meaning versus the expected definition which is "at the core level".

Even for AMD, going back to Phenom vs. Athlon X2 the discussion of K10 IPC vs K8 IPC was on a core-normalized basis, at no point was the term intentionally misused to imply "aggregate instructions per clock stemming from all cores contained within the socket".

If AMD marketing comes out now and attempts to claim that they meant this new definition of "IPC" is what they meant would not be decreasing with bulldozer over phenom II then I will be truly disgusted at the efforts to intentionally mislead.
 

sequoia464

Senior member
Feb 12, 2003
870
0
71
You must lead a tough life. How do you buy gasoline, given your disdain for bad corp. ethics? Or buy almost anything? Have yet to see many corp. entities that are truly altruistic or even close to being warm hearted. Outside Newman's Own, not many out there.

I do what I can do - however insignificant. I recognize the realities but it doesn't mean I have to accept them. I agree with your statement about corporations in general, I just try to go with the lesser of the evils when I can.

I have a small business myself and I see and feel the effects of business ethics personally, probably why it matters more to me than some.

I shouldn't have commented on this initially at all, as this thread is about bulldozer not corp ethics, I should have kept the 2500K that I returned and I wouldn't even need to be following the Bulldozer threads - kicking myself about that one.
 
Last edited:

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
I do what I can do - however insignificant. I recognize the realities but it doesn't mean I have to accept them. I agree with your statement about corporations in general, I just try to go with the lesser of the evils when I can.

I hope you can recognize the self-defeating aspects of relying on yourself to be the judge of what you think to be an evil corp versus a lesser evil corp.

The truly evil corp will be so good at being evil that it will deftly convince you that IT is the lesser evil.

Unless you view yourself to be supremely intelligent to the collective brains employed at evil corp XYZ, you have to acknowledge the reality that you are led to believe whatever they want you to believe about any given corporation.

In your efforts to be noble you may well be an unwitting supporter of the bigger evil. A pawn is a pawn and nothing leaves you more open to manipulation by others than your own ignorance.

I know I am ignorant of the truth of what goes on between AMD and Intel, at best we are exposed to half-truths from both as they see fit in their marketing efforts to prop themselves up while putting their competition down.
 

CHADBOGA

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2009
2,135
833
136
Thats from your perspective . He was just countering your and others over hype he was balance. You got alot of people banned at XS.over the last 6 years YOUR PH I hype was the same.
The idiot mods at XS are the real villains in getting people banned.

Inf64 is just your typical dumbarse AMDroid.

Personal attacks are not permitted in these forums. Please refrain from this type of posting in the future.
Anandtech Moderator - Keysplayr
 
Last edited by a moderator:

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
Uh I see I have a couple of "fans" here :D.
Nice to see you again Chad,was missing your ramblings at XS /sarcasm

Anyhow,we have more leaks from Sisoft,this time it's Valencia. While it does score somewhat better than that Zambezi chip ,in both int and fp benchmarks,it still is kinda slower in integer per core than MC/Lisbon generation. So translated: not good. In FP it trounces MC core but that was kinda expected. Integer is still prevailing workload in server and desktop (90% of all workloads are integer),so if nothing changes with retail chips ,Zambezi will have a hard time versus Thuban.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Keep it respectful guys. Fugger runs his forum as he likes, Anand runs his as he likes.

Please take some time to familiarize yourselves with the following portions of the AnandTech Forum Guidelines:
1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
We want to give all our members as much freedom as possible while maintaining an environment that encourages productive discussion. It is our desire to encourage our members to share their knowledge and experiences in order to benefit the rest of the community, while also providing a place for people to come and just hang out.

We also intend to encourage respect and responsibility among members in order to maintain order and civility. Our social forums will have a relaxed atmosphere, but other forums will be expected to remain on-topic and posts should be helpful, relevant and professional.

We ask for respect and common decency towards your fellow forum members.

We welcome you both here to these forums and we look forward to your being part of the ATF community, but you can't bring this sort of animosity with you, that's not how we treat each other here.

Idontcare
Super Mod
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
@ mods
Sorry guys,but they started their BS so what can I do? I basically didn't respond to their provocations,just added few more names to ignore list.Much better now. It's also a good offtopic filter since now I see only relevant posts ;).
Anyhow I won't respond to their provocations any more.

Back to topic. I have posted some comparisons versus "old" Magny Cours sisoft results here. I reckon it's easier to just link to the topic over there than to re-post everything here.
 

drizek

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,410
0
71
Here's an interesting thing to consider, if AMD never bought ATI, INtel would have continued to rely on them and nvidia to make chipsets, and they might never have developed something like Sandy Bridge with an integrated IGP or Quicksync.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
@ mods
Sorry guys,but they started their BS so what can I do? I basically didn't respond to their provocations,just added few more names to ignore list.Much better now. It's also a good offtopic filter since now I see only relevant posts ;).
Anyhow I won't respond to their provocations any more.

Back to topic. I have posted some comparisons versus "old" Magny Cours sisoft results here. I reckon it's easier to just link to the topic over there than to re-post everything here.

First, use the reported-post feature by clicking the
report.gif
button located in the lower-left corner of their post, underneath their post-count and join-date stats.

Second, use the ignore feature, as you've noted.

Third, contact the moderator team via the Moderator Discussions sub-forum (see links and references to in in the ATF guidelines I linked above).

Public responses are viewed as "taking the bait and reprising" which is treated equally as the originating offense of baiting itself. Two wrongs don't make a right, yaddi yadda.

Also be aware that we do not allow members to harrass each other through the private-messaging system. You will find a report-post button in the pm's as well, if a member is harrassing you by way of pm's just report their pm's and leave it to the mods to take care of it.
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
Ok ,thanks Idontcare! I haven't got any PMs so far,but you never know :).
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
I dont know why someone would even bother to post all that crap when it is obviously slower than a phenom X6. Why not compare directly to phenom? Why even muddy the waters by putting intel in there? If it cant even beat previous generation amd, then it is doa. So these guys need to stop with the intel clusterFUD.

You could argue all these benchmarks are pointless until we see official benchmarks from Anandtech and other well known web sites when NDA is finally lifted etc...end of the day we can only speculate a guess on what we have seen so far .

Personally I'm staying neutral until I see official benchmarks,once they are officially out I'll make my decision on my next upgrade ie BD or 2500K.

I only know one thing,either AMD or Intel will get my money next month (actually it could be both :cool: ).

:)
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Here's an interesting thing to consider, if AMD never bought ATI, INtel would have continued to rely on them and nvidia to make chipsets, and they might never have developed something like Sandy Bridge with an integrated IGP or Quicksync.

I think the main issue is not that AMD purchased ATI, but:

1) The timing was awful both from ATI's stock price/AMD's cash flow at the time
2) The price premium paid considering 0 competing bids. :rolleyes:
3) AMD decided to purchase ATI 5 years before Fusion was technically feasible while full well behind C2D with Phenom I still > 1 year away from launch. Management was well aware of all of this...

I also think Intel was looking to put a GPU inside a CPU as soon as possible. They simply weren't able to do it back then since technology didn't allow it. I doubt Fusion had anything to do with it since Intel was selling IGP for a long time. So it would have made a lot of sense to integrate it into their future CPUs to save costs, eventually anyway.
 
Last edited:

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,131
3,667
126
I WANT REAL TESTED SCORES!!!

im hearing too many things from the left.. the left... and then too many things from the right.. the right!

someone from up just drop us the ball with real scorees!
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
AMD has an announcement tomorrow, we'll see guys, we'll see...

I thought we were all in agreement in concluding that tomorrow's announcement is going to be entirely fusion related (the unlocked Llano's for desktop enthusiasts) and have nothing to do with bulldozer/zambezi?