SiS 651 faster than XFX GeForce 6200 256MB????

[behrangsa]

Is GeForce 6200/PCI-E/256MB for Athlon64 slower than SiS 651 in one or more aspects?

 

[Rock Hydra]

I'm thinking that these are integrated graphics, which would most likely be slower than the 6200. Also, if you're considering getting that 6200. Get the 128 MB version (unless it's cheaper for the 256 one) since having 256 MB of RAM won't benefit over 128 MB.

 

[behrangsa]

Actually I've already got the 6200 but to my surprise it's very slow in some aspects. For example, Java/Swing applications are flicking on my screen. I tested both Linux and Windows and the performance was really unacceptable. I don't know if this a bug or not. (

 

[imported_killuminati]

if u want a good Intregatered chipset , then get the ATI radeon Xpress .

AMD Socket 939 :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813153027 ( with onboard Memory for the IGP ) .
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813130485 ( MSI one )
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813135191 ECS one ) .

Intel LGA775 :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813131531 ( Best mobo by Asus )
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813135196 ( again ECS )

Best 6200 for AGP 8x :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814125183

Best for 6200 PCIe :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814130227

Peace & caio !!!

 

[Peter]

>Intregatered

Integrated. Thank you.

SiS 651, being a chipset-integrated shared-memory effort, is about an order of magnitude slower in most things than a 6200, even if the latter is a castrated "TurboCache" version.

 

[Sunbird]

Dude, have you installed the right drivers?