• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

SiS 651 faster than XFX GeForce 6200 256MB????

I'm thinking that these are integrated graphics, which would most likely be slower than the 6200. Also, if you're considering getting that 6200. Get the 128 MB version (unless it's cheaper for the 256 one) since having 256 MB of RAM won't benefit over 128 MB.
 
Actually I've already got the 6200 but to my surprise it's very slow in some aspects. For example, Java/Swing applications are flicking on my screen. I tested both Linux and Windows and the performance was really unacceptable. I don't know if this a bug or not. 🙁(
 
 
>Intregatered

Integrated. Thank you.

SiS 651, being a chipset-integrated shared-memory effort, is about an order of magnitude slower in most things than a 6200, even if the latter is a castrated "TurboCache" version.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top