When this camera first came out, it was $150 after rebate, and I jumped on it.
Tried finding review first, but they were little to none.
Thought, how bad could a 2.1 megapixel be compared to the 0.3 megapixel it would replace?
After 2 weeks, and 100's of pictures, I send it back for a refund.
My old Ricoh 800x600, (RDC 300z), 0.3 megapixel camera did much better.
Have seen Poloroid 640x480 produce better results than this SiPix.
Instead bought a Olympus D460z 1.2 megapixel camera. 3x optical + 2x digital zoom (all digital zooms are useless).
The Oly ($199 refurb) blows the SiPix away.
5"x7" prints are what I do most, but even at 8"x10" the 1.2 Oly beats the 2.1 SiPix for quality.
Check out most review sites and forums for similar results.
Poor image quality is the key phrase here with the SiPix.
Even though SiPix claims 2.1 megapixels, it only performs about as well as 1 megapixel camera's.
For $100 you can do better than this. Or spend an extra $50, and do MUCH better than this.
Look for Factory refurbished at some of the retail online auction stores (not e8ay).
Most camera's (even ultra cheap ones) use AA batteries (get NiMH), have TV Out, and include 8 meg cards.
Facebook
Twitter