- Aug 28, 2001
- 52,844
- 1,049
- 126
Was wondering what your input is on this... it's quite comical actually...
- Person A has multiple vehicles in their driveway since they restore cars
- Someone has been siphoning person A's gas for months
- Person A decides to put sugar in the tank of one of the vehicles that does not have an engine
- Someone's vehicle develops problems and person A finds out it's their neighbor (Ford Probe)
[Redemption is so sweet isn't it ?]
- Neighbor confronts person A and threatens to sue, presumably will claim they put sugar directly into his tank.
Basically it's a their-word-against-his deal right now... what can come of this ? Should person A go so far as to have the contents of both tanks tested to prove it's the same gas (thus siphoned) and get their neighbor in legal trouble too ?
- Person A has multiple vehicles in their driveway since they restore cars
- Someone has been siphoning person A's gas for months
- Person A decides to put sugar in the tank of one of the vehicles that does not have an engine
- Someone's vehicle develops problems and person A finds out it's their neighbor (Ford Probe)
[Redemption is so sweet isn't it ?]
- Neighbor confronts person A and threatens to sue, presumably will claim they put sugar directly into his tank.
Basically it's a their-word-against-his deal right now... what can come of this ? Should person A go so far as to have the contents of both tanks tested to prove it's the same gas (thus siphoned) and get their neighbor in legal trouble too ?