• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sin City 2

Regs

Regs

Lifer
After watching Sin City One... (and peeing my pants in laughter), I checked to see when the next Sin City will be out.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458481/maindetails



Johnny Depp ... (rumored)

Jessica Alba ... Nancy Callahan

Clive Owen ... Dwight McCarthy

Rosario Dawson ... Gail

Danny Trejo

Devon Aoki ... Miho

Brittany Murphy ... Shellie

Rachel Weisz ... Ava Lord (rumored)

Antonio Banderas ... (rumored)

Michael Madsen ... Bob

Mickey Rourke ... Marv

Michael Clarke Duncan ... Manute

Jaime King ... Goldie/Wendy
Powers Boothe ... Senator Roark (attached)

Rey-Phillip Santos ... Carlos (in talks)
Nicholas Marino ... Orrin (attached)

Daniel Delevin ... Carl (rumored)


To bad Bruce Willis won't be back.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
It's Sim City 2000, noob.

Crap, I can't read.
Click to expand...

That must have been a really quick reply if you didn't even have time to realize it was about the movie, what with the list of actors and all.
 
Originally posted by: mayonnaise
Meh, I never really liked the first one.. decent movie but nothing amazing as many people made it out to be.
Click to expand...

Thought the same. Had some good parts, Mickey Rourke was great as Marv, didn't care for many of the other characters. Effects were great but effects don't make a movie, just look at 300...yuck.
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
i feel that that was a movie that shoudln't have gotten a sequal, not that it was but, but that it felt concluded.
Click to expand...

Not that I'm good at spelling or grammar, but that sentence needs better punctuation!!

Edit: scratch that it needs better everything lol
 
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
i feel that that was a movie that shoudln't have gotten a sequal, not that it was but, but that it felt concluded.
Click to expand...

Not that I'm good at spelling or grammar, but that sentence needs better punctuation!!

Edit: scratch that it needs better everything lol
Click to expand...

Thanks for your help.

Though I must correct you now.

Anandtech OT rule #1 under section A
Never correct more than one person under the same thread!!
 
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
i feel that that was a movie that shouldn't have gotten a sequel; not that it was bad or anything, but I felt that it was concluded.
Click to expand...

Not that I'm good at spelling or grammar, but that sentence needs better punctuation!!

Edit: scratch that it needs better everything lol
Click to expand...

improved 😛

i'm really tired atm 😀
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
i feel that that was a movie that shoudln't have gotten a sequal, not that it was but, but that it felt concluded.
Click to expand...

Heck no. All those corrupt cops and politicians need to pay their dues!
 
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: mayonnaise
Meh, I never really liked the first one.. decent movie but nothing amazing as many people made it out to be.
Click to expand...

Thought the same. Had some good parts, Mickey Rourke was great as Marv, didn't care for many of the other characters. Effects were great but effects don't make a movie, just look at 300...yuck.
Click to expand...

It felt like I was playing Bioshock or Max Payne when I watched it. It's one of those movies that catches your imagination if you let. I liked getting sucked into a world I could likely never think up in my head on my own.

Kind of like what Doom 3 should of been....
 
Well, as far as it not needing a sequel... those stories already existed in the comic before the movie came out, it's not like they just made up something to follow Sin City because it was successful. Besides which it isn't really a sequel, all of the stories are connected, but are for the most part self-contained.
 
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: mayonnaise
Meh, I never really liked the first one.. decent movie but nothing amazing as many people made it out to be.
Click to expand...

Thought the same. Had some good parts, Mickey Rourke was great as Marv, didn't care for many of the other characters. Effects were great but effects don't make a movie, just look at 300...yuck.
Click to expand...

Yucking at 300? Man card, NOW
 
Just saw it last night on TV (guessing OP did too😉). Overall, it was a pretty good "show" with the classic pointless Tarantino-esque (ya, I know the director knows/works with him) style. I'd watch it again, but the lack of a real "story" kills it slightly.
 
I thought Sin City 1 was pretty good, certainly entertaining... hope the 2nd one will be the same...
 
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Well, as far as it not needing a sequel... those stories already existed in the comic before the movie came out, it's not like they just made up something to follow Sin City because it was successful. Besides which it isn't really a sequel, all of the stories are connected, but are for the most part self-contained.
Click to expand...
Actually, they've stated Frank Miller is writing an original story for the next movie (the other two are from the comic). It shows what happens to Jessica Alba's character, presumbably because they need her for T&A appeal, since her character wasn't interesting and she can't act for ****.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top