cKGunslinger
Lifer
- Nov 29, 1999
- 16,408
- 57
- 91
Of course there are, but there are FAR MORE ultra-elite snobs, smelly tree-hugging hippies, hard-core communists, and dirty Red Sox fans in the Democratic Party.
And besides, I've fixed many a PC with a ball-peen hammer - one way or another.
umbrella39
Lifer
- Jun 11, 2004
- 13,816
- 1,126
- 126
- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,894
- 10,720
- 147
Thanks, Ck, I needed that humorous respite from the angry "culture" wars. It somehow gives me hope for all of us! :laugh::thumbsup:Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Of course there are, but there are FAR MORE ultra-elite snobs, smelly tree-hugging hippies, hard-core communists, and dirty Red Sox fans in the Democratic Party.
And besides, I've fixed many a PC with a ball-peen hammer - one way or another.
Zebo
Elite Member
- Jul 29, 2001
- 39,398
- 19
- 81
What do you mean why they get away with it? Republican policy sell out tax payers for the elite which is usually white NE types. Since most americans are poor and middle class and especially blacks are, black republicans are seen as cooning/uncle toming for a buck. Just like powell, cooned, and kept his mouth shut about the lies that lead our nation into war, mainly killing his brothers and sisters, all for a buck. Check out Powells net worth around 50 mill. mainly from 100K a pop "speaking fees" at DOD contrators to pimp war.
Zebo
Elite Member
- Jul 29, 2001
- 39,398
- 19
- 81
Getting ownd usually does that.
Name a progressive Democrat who opposed civil rights legislation. You don't mean Strom Thurmond do you? Who later became a Republican and who modern Republicans Like Lott champion for president? Oh he was a Democrat alright, but not a very progressive one.
Which party you think wrote and proposed the Civil Rights Act? Ever heard of Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Ted Kennedy? Here's a hint, not the party of Lincoln (former president who freed slaves .)
azazyel
Diamond Member
- Oct 6, 2000
- 5,872
- 1
- 81
well, this would have been better if posted earlier but I still think it's kind of funny.
USA today did some bad photoshopping on a picture of Condoleezza Rice that gave her evil eyes...
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm
What's really funny is how the Freepers reacted to it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509422/posts
USA today did some bad photoshopping on a picture of Condoleezza Rice that gave her evil eyes...
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm
What's really funny is how the Freepers reacted to it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509422/posts
While the term "sambo" is not appropriate, a black man would have to be simple to run as a Republican. Hell, anyone who isn't rich would have to be simple to run as a Republican.
db
Lifer
- Dec 6, 1999
- 10,575
- 292
- 126
If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes accept as the truth:
"left wing media" and "liberal media".
Fact is, media (and Hollywood) is owned mostly by conservatives.
Ya know, when you watch the bobble-heads, it hypnotises you into thinking...."Yes, he's right". (Rush).
Folks, most of you are smart--start thinking for yourselves instead of just repeating what others say.
"left wing media" and "liberal media".
Fact is, media (and Hollywood) is owned mostly by conservatives.
Ya know, when you watch the bobble-heads, it hypnotises you into thinking...."Yes, he's right". (Rush).
Folks, most of you are smart--start thinking for yourselves instead of just repeating what others say.
Heh, I don't know where your facts are from, but George Soros ain't exactly a conservative.
Hollywood $$$, by and large, go to the Dems.
For the same reason liberals have traditionally gotten it. The people have been lied to, time and time again. For all those blacks who think liberals are doing good for them, Have a Look-see here.
Fortunately, the black community IS waking up. The last figures I saw (from 2000) showed the percentage of Blacks identifying as Democrats down from 74% to 63%.
Nah, I don't think so. People saw right through the Dem's pathetic attempts to politicize anything and everything Hurricane-related. A big Bush bash / hate session, per usual. The voters won't forget
Steve Gilliard is black, and his use of the "simple sambo" routine an inside joke, an attack on Steele for being everything that white racists paint blacks to be. At least in Gilliard's opinion. His views on race are quite strong, largely viewing black republicans as delusional tools of the white establishment, and also very critical of Dems who'll consort with the enemy, so to speak. He recently denounced Lieberman-
"As a black man, I'm real glad Lieberman fought for civil rights long ago. But what good is that if he dines with racists now? And that is what Atrios pointed out, that NR has never renounced one racist word they have published. Not one. Not from Sobran or Derbyshire.
Wittman, I don't want to hear about the past. I want to hear about the present and why Lieberman would attend a function of racists. Why would a man of such character attend a meeting of such vile people [...]
So why is he sitting at the head table of racists like Buckley, who's race baiting is legendary and archived, and Rush Limbaugh, who's disdain for blacks is well known.
No, I'm afraid you're the wrong one here. Lieberman had no business at the National Review, except to protest it, and instead he sat at the head table. I think the Lieberman of 1964 would be ashamed of the Lieberman of 2005.
If any apologies are owed, it's from Lieberman associating with the Brooks Brothers racists set. Or you might think that the National Review isn't racist. But you have more sense than that."
From here-
http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Steve%20Gilliard
Just so we all know who it is that we're talking about....
"As a black man, I'm real glad Lieberman fought for civil rights long ago. But what good is that if he dines with racists now? And that is what Atrios pointed out, that NR has never renounced one racist word they have published. Not one. Not from Sobran or Derbyshire.
Wittman, I don't want to hear about the past. I want to hear about the present and why Lieberman would attend a function of racists. Why would a man of such character attend a meeting of such vile people [...]
So why is he sitting at the head table of racists like Buckley, who's race baiting is legendary and archived, and Rush Limbaugh, who's disdain for blacks is well known.
No, I'm afraid you're the wrong one here. Lieberman had no business at the National Review, except to protest it, and instead he sat at the head table. I think the Lieberman of 1964 would be ashamed of the Lieberman of 2005.
If any apologies are owed, it's from Lieberman associating with the Brooks Brothers racists set. Or you might think that the National Review isn't racist. But you have more sense than that."
From here-
http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Steve%20Gilliard
Just so we all know who it is that we're talking about....
Actually, they were. And many still are! Living almost out of the US, you wouldn't know about things way down here.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Nah, I don't think so. People saw right through the Dem's pathetic attempts to politicize anything and everything Hurricane-related. A big Bush bash / hate session, per usual. The voters won't forget
Didn't the Republicans try and do pretty much the same thing? Instead of admitting that FEMA may have made mistakes, it all became about how NO is a crummy liberal town with stupid residents and crappy leaders. I don't know about you, but attacking the victims of a natural disaster just doesn't seem like a smart PR move. Right up there with "come on, she was wearing a short skirt".
I realize them acting like a bunch of jackasses tends to attract a few voters, but if they keep it up, I think you'll be surprised what the voters will remember come election day
Also, this topic is just dumb. The "liberal media", embodied in a satirist blog? That's almost as bad as people complaining about the liberal media and using the Daily Show as their example.
[/quote]:roll:
The parties switched around. Liberals went from Repubs to Demos and vice versa.[/quote]
Approximately when did this happen?
The parties switched around. Liberals went from Repubs to Demos and vice versa.[/quote]
Approximately when did this happen?
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter