Silent boost vs SLK800

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
Which one do you think is better?

I have a silent boost+smart fanII that really manages to work well. I'm in SLK800+SFII temps and I'll try to improve it in the next few days.
My vote is Silent boost as it works just as well at half the price.

So what's your opinion?
 

Cesar

Banned
Jan 12, 2003
458
0
0
silent boost is better but there is no review that proves it do you know any?
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: Cesar
silent boost is better but there is no review that proves it do you know any?

You took the words out of my mouth or fingertips :p
 

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
I didn't expect this response.... I thought everybody was going to tell thermaltake is crap.

Thanks for the replys :beer:
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
My opinion is that the heatsink designs are simliar enough that they are very comparable. The heatsink is a big piece of metal and won't fail (I've never seen the heatsink itself fail...). The Silent Boost fan is a Panaflo, they are already known to be very well made fans.

So it can't really be "crap" :p
 

Lyfer

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,842
2
81
Originally posted by: McArra
I didn't expect this response.... I thought everybody was going to tell thermaltake is crap.

Thanks for the replys :beer:

Thermaltake is crap:p. Looks like a quality design to me though, personally I would get an $16 Thermalirght SK7 and slap on a good 80MM fan. (which performs a little marginally less than the SLK800 but is cheaper than the silent boost:))