Dumac
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wow I hadn't seen a PC elitist post on these forums in quite some time, but you take the cake Piuc2020
LOL I'm not an elitist, far from it, despite the disappointment Bioshock was in comparison to System Shock 2 I still enjoyed that game a LOT for example. I don't dislike console games at all (heck last gen I played a LOT more games on my PS2 than my PC), like I said, I just feel a new entry in a franchise should be kept to the same spirit and feel as the last entry, Fallout 3 looks good (I'll probably buy it), it just doesn't look like a Fallout game, in fact, it seems a lot like an action game with some RPG elements than anything else, it's not a bad thing, but it shouldn't be called Fallout 3.
It'd be like Bungie releasing Halo 4 and making it an incredibly complex and dialogue-filled RPG with strategic turn-based combat and stats, 1 hour cut scenes or whatever. It might end up being a good game but it wouldn't be Halo 4 and every Halo fan on the planet would likely be disappointed.
My thoughts are, just don't milk a franchise if you are not going to do justice to it, just create a new IP and everyone will be happier.
That being said, Fallout 3 might end up being a worthy Fallout 2 succesor, so I'm not going to jump to conclusions, I'm just saying what the videos and previews have conveyed to me.
Don't worry, I understood what you are saying and agree completely 😛
After what Bethesda did to TES, I'm not crossing fingers on this one.