SickBeast Marks© are the new Rating System of choice!

[Avalon]

Everyone should bet their life on Sickbeast Marks.

 

[JujuFish]

Originally posted by: munky
A somewhat more accurate benchmark would be:

(core clock * (texture units + pixel shaders)/2 + mem clock * (bus width/16)) / 500
I divide by 500 to give the number some meaning

for example:
x1900xtx = (650 * (16+48)/2 + 775 * (256/16)) / 500 = 66.4
7800gtx512 = ((550 * 24) + 850 * (256/16)) / 500 = 52.4
x850xtpe = ((540 * 16) + 590 * (256/16)) / 500 = 36.16
6600gt = ((500 * 8) + 500 * (128/16)) / 500 = 16

This way the numbers are at least somewhat representaive of the cards' performance in some theoretical game at some undetermined settings.

*revised for balance

(325 * (4 + 4)/2 + 200 * 128/16)/500

= 5.8 Munky Marks... Yup. Upgrade time.

 

[jevans64]

SickBeast Marks for my video cards.

6800GT = 350 * 16 * 450 = 2,520,000 SickBeast Marks
7800GS OC = 400 * 16 * 625 = 4,000,000 SickBeast Marks
x800xt PE = 520 * 16 * 560 = 4,659,200 SickBeast Marks

 

[otispunkmeyer]

Originally posted by: SickBeast

Originally posted by: pol II
My 7800GTX = 6,480,000 Sick Beast Marks (I think that's correct...)

Did you overclock?

From my other thread:

Originally posted by: SickBeast
So if you take the 7800GT at 400mhz x 20 pipelines x 500mhz RAM, you get "4 Million SickBeast Marks©".

So if you take the standard GTX at 430mhz x 24 pipelines x 600mhz RAM, you get "6.19 Million SickBeast Marks©".

If you take the GTX 512MB at 550mhz x 24 pipelines x 850mhz RAM, you get "11.22 Million SickBeast Marks".

If you take the "new" 7900GTX at 700mhz x 32 pipelines x 850mhz RAM, you get "19.04 Million SickBeast Marks©".

Now, quickly compared with the ATI cards:

For the X1800XT, at 625mhz x 16 pipelines x 750mhz memory, you get "7.5 Million SickBeast Marks©".

For the X1900XT at 625mhz x 48 pipelines x 725mhz memory, you get "21.75 Million SickBeast Marks©".

is that valid though? for pixel shading yes, but then its only got 16 for everything else.

 

[SickBeast]

Originally posted by: munky
A somewhat more accurate benchmark would be:

(core clock * (texture units + pixel shaders)/2 + mem clock * (bus width/16)) / 500
I divide by 500 to give the number some meaning

for example:
x1900xtx = (650 * (16+48)/2 + 775 * (256/16)) / 500 = 66.4
7800gtx512 = ((550 * 24) + 850 * (256/16)) / 500 = 52.4
x850xtpe = ((540 * 16) + 590 * (256/16)) / 500 = 36.16
6600gt = ((500 * 8) + 500 * (128/16)) / 500 = 16

This way the numbers are at least somewhat representaive of the cards' performance in some theoretical game at some undetermined settings.

*revised for balance

Hey, if you want to make Munky Marks©, be my guest, but do it in another thread.

People could barely do *MY* math, and now you want them to calculate your quadratic equasion?

Please keep in mind that I have a patent pending on this method of calculating video card "marks".

I do, however, give you full permission to create a new "Munky Mark©" thread. Depending on your results I may or may not endorse it. :beer:

 

[Stoneburner]

Sick beast marks should take into account how many minutes it takes to load 3dmark06.

 

[Cooler]

Great I get 5,760,000 SBM on my 600/600 x850xt pe OC .
So dose this mean its better then 7800GT?:evil: