Show your support for our troops

[CKent]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: RBachman
Pretty difficult to show support for them without showing support for a needless and unpopular war and the murderers who pushed it through an unwilling UN...

Should we have kept to the status quo and killed 500,000 Iraqis a year instead under sanctions?

That was the number the left were tossing out before we invaded Iraq. So should we have let 100,000 live and let 1,000,000 die in their stead?

That number's ridiculous, link or shens. Anyway, how many will die because the billions we've spent could've instead been aid in the form of food to starving people? How many will die as we continue Vietnam II? How many will die in the future terrorist attacks we've ensured? How will our society change for the worse as terrorism increases and world opinion of us plummets?

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.

Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

You were probably creaming your pants when Ken Starr was investigating a private matter but you won't lift one finger of protest about a lie of a war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars?


Typical brainless partisan.

Wow, the typical Clinton defense from the left - how cute. :roll:

You have a right to your opinion on this war but that doesn't mean you are right or that anyone who doesn't think what you do is a "brainless partisan". Actually it's quite the opposite from what I've seen here. You and others constantly only look for something you perceive as bad and claim it is the only truth. Your blatant disregard for the whole picture leads me to believe that you are the one who is just a brainless partisan - not to mention a tool for the far left fringe.

I see you aren't contesting the truth of the communist funding/support. Good to see you are wising up a bit, because it's established FACT.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.

Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

You were probably creaming your pants when Ken Starr was investigating a private matter but you won't lift one finger of protest about a lie of a war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars?


Typical brainless partisan.

Wow, the typical Clinton defense from the left - how cute. :roll:

You have a right to your opinion on this war but that doesn't mean you are right or that anyone who doesn't think what you do is a "brainless partisan". Actually it's quite the opposite from what I've seen here. You and others constantly only look for something you perceive as bad and claim it is the only truth. Your blatant disregard for the whole picture leads me to believe that you are the one who is just a brainless partisan - not to mention a tool for the far left fringe.

I see you aren't contesting the truth of the communist funding/support. Good to see you are wising up a bit, because it's established FACT.

There's more than one group out trying to impeach the Propagandist. In fact, some include Representatives in the US Congress.

I do, however, note your ignoring of the FACT that the Move America Forward group was CREATED by a GOP PR firm. This group is a BS facade to spew jingoistic crap and drum up fear and hate of the "left". Well, guess what? The MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.

Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

You were probably creaming your pants when Ken Starr was investigating a private matter but you won't lift one finger of protest about a lie of a war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars?


Typical brainless partisan.

Wow, the typical Clinton defense from the left - how cute. :roll:

You have a right to your opinion on this war but that doesn't mean you are right or that anyone who doesn't think what you do is a "brainless partisan". Actually it's quite the opposite from what I've seen here. You and others constantly only look for something you perceive as bad and claim it is the only truth. Your blatant disregard for the whole picture leads me to believe that you are the one who is just a brainless partisan - not to mention a tool for the far left fringe.

I see you aren't contesting the truth of the communist funding/support. Good to see you are wising up a bit, because it's established FACT.

There's more than one group out trying to impeach the Propagandist. In fact, some include Representatives in the US Congress.

I do, however, note your ignoring of the FACT that the Move America Forward group was CREATED by a GOP PR firm. This group is a BS facade to spew jingoistic crap and drum up fear and hate of the "left". Well, guess what? The MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq.

There was no ignoring anything. I know it's roots, just like I know the roots of ANSWER, and the others.
But it looks like I gave you credit too soon. Are you denying that the communists aren't funding/supporting these activities?

BTW - you can keep trying to make the claim that people oppose our continued presence but that is just another LIE you've spun and convinced yourself of. LIAR

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

 

[digiram]

Oh..You guys are rallying to get them home. That's awesome. I'm in

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: conjur
There's more than one group out trying to impeach the Propagandist. In fact, some include Representatives in the US Congress.

ROFLMAO. Who are these Congressmen out to impeach Bush? Oh, wait, are you talking about that crackpot Pelosi?

I do, however, note your ignoring of the FACT that the Move America Forward group was CREATED by a GOP PR firm. This group is a BS facade to spew jingoistic crap and drum up fear and hate of the "left". Well, guess what? The MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq.

Come on, no one needs to "drum up" fear of the left. The American people voted down the left and all its hatred and blame America crap in the last election and expect another resounding win for Republicans in 2006.

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

Looks to me like 63% oppose our continued presence, and that poll's no doubt pulled from one of the far right sites you "people" frequent. Take a deep breath and rethink what you said...

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: RBachman

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

Looks to me like 63% oppose our continued presence, and that poll's no doubt pulled from one of the far right sites you "people" frequent. Take a deep breath and rethink what you said...

Nope. "withdraw some" does not mean "oppose continued presence" no matter how much you try to spin it.

HAHA - polling report reports on the polls done by the MSM and polling companies. But I suppose in your mind reporting the numbers from the polls is somehow "right-wing.:roll: Grow up.

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: RBachman

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

Looks to me like 63% oppose our continued presence, and that poll's no doubt pulled from one of the far right sites you "people" frequent. Take a deep breath and rethink what you said...

Nope. "withdraw some" does not mean "oppose continued presence" no matter how much you try to spin it.

HAHA - polling report reports on the polls done by the MSM and polling companies. But I suppose in your mind reporting the numbers from the polls is somehow "right-wing.:roll: Grow up.

Withdraw some certainly does mean oppose continued presence. It'd be the first step in a rational end to this irrational war - pulling out now all at once is obviously not the best way to go about it. Take your own advice.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.

Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

You were probably creaming your pants when Ken Starr was investigating a private matter but you won't lift one finger of protest about a lie of a war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars?


Typical brainless partisan.

Wow, the typical Clinton defense from the left - how cute. :roll:

You have a right to your opinion on this war but that doesn't mean you are right or that anyone who doesn't think what you do is a "brainless partisan". Actually it's quite the opposite from what I've seen here. You and others constantly only look for something you perceive as bad and claim it is the only truth. Your blatant disregard for the whole picture leads me to believe that you are the one who is just a brainless partisan - not to mention a tool for the far left fringe.

I see you aren't contesting the truth of the communist funding/support. Good to see you are wising up a bit, because it's established FACT.

There's more than one group out trying to impeach the Propagandist. In fact, some include Representatives in the US Congress.

I do, however, note your ignoring of the FACT that the Move America Forward group was CREATED by a GOP PR firm. This group is a BS facade to spew jingoistic crap and drum up fear and hate of the "left". Well, guess what? The MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq.

There was no ignoring anything. I know it's roots, just like I know the roots of ANSWER, and the others.
But it looks like I gave you credit too soon. Are you denying that the communists aren't funding/supporting these activities?

BTW - you can keep trying to make the claim that people oppose our continued presence but that is just another LIE you've spun and convinced yourself of. LIAR

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

"LIAR"? You wouldn't be a formerly banned troll now, would you? I seem to recall someone used to call me that quite a bit in the past and even capitalized it, too. Hmmm.


But, to dismiss you entirely:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/20/poll/

Nearly six in 10 Americans oppose the war in Iraq and a growing number of them are dissatisfied with the war on terrorism, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

And that was June.

Here's something newer from that communist, leftist rag, the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,..._20060915,00.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

A plurality of Americans has favored reducing troop levels in Iraq for most of the year. Now, 55% favor bringing soldiers home, while just 36% back Mr. Bush's position that current levels should be maintained to help secure peace and stability.p

Only 1/3 favor the current level. Who's in the majority, eh?

And, by your own link, it shows 2/3 want all or partial troop withdrawals. That's not a continued presence in the sense of "staying the course" that this administration spews constantly. In fact, if you look further down on that link you'll find even more polls showing Americans want out of Iraq.

But, it's nice that you support a group whose entire purpose is pure propaganda. Bravo. :roll:

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.

Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

You were probably creaming your pants when Ken Starr was investigating a private matter but you won't lift one finger of protest about a lie of a war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars?


Typical brainless partisan.

Wow, the typical Clinton defense from the left - how cute. :roll:

You have a right to your opinion on this war but that doesn't mean you are right or that anyone who doesn't think what you do is a "brainless partisan". Actually it's quite the opposite from what I've seen here. You and others constantly only look for something you perceive as bad and claim it is the only truth. Your blatant disregard for the whole picture leads me to believe that you are the one who is just a brainless partisan - not to mention a tool for the far left fringe.

I see you aren't contesting the truth of the communist funding/support. Good to see you are wising up a bit, because it's established FACT.

There's more than one group out trying to impeach the Propagandist. In fact, some include Representatives in the US Congress.

I do, however, note your ignoring of the FACT that the Move America Forward group was CREATED by a GOP PR firm. This group is a BS facade to spew jingoistic crap and drum up fear and hate of the "left". Well, guess what? The MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq.

There was no ignoring anything. I know it's roots, just like I know the roots of ANSWER, and the others.
But it looks like I gave you credit too soon. Are you denying that the communists aren't funding/supporting these activities?

BTW - you can keep trying to make the claim that people oppose our continued presence but that is just another LIE you've spun and convinced yourself of. LIAR

"Which comes closest to your view about what the U.S. should now do about the number of U.S. troops in Iraq? The U.S. should send more troops to Iraq. The U.S. should keep the number of troops as it is now. The U.S. should withdraw some troops from Iraq. OR, The U.S. should withdraw all of its troops from Iraq."
9/16-18/05
8 - send more
26 - Same as now
33 - withdraw some
30 - withdraw all
3 - unsure

THAT is the only question you could have used to make your claim - and judging by the results - you are a LIAR. But hey, I've known that for a while now.

"LIAR"? You wouldn't be a formerly banned troll now, would you? I seem to recall someone used to call me that quite a bit in the past and even capitalized it, too. Hmmm.


But, to dismiss you entirely:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/20/poll/

Nearly six in 10 Americans oppose the war in Iraq and a growing number of them are dissatisfied with the war on terrorism, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

And that was June.

Here's something newer from that communist, leftist rag, the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,..._20060915,00.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

A plurality of Americans has favored reducing troop levels in Iraq for most of the year. Now, 55% favor bringing soldiers home, while just 36% back Mr. Bush's position that current levels should be maintained to help secure peace and stability.p

Only 1/3 favor the current level. Who's in the majority, eh?

And, by your own link, it shows 2/3 want all or partial troop withdrawals. That's not a continued presence in the sense of "staying the course" that this administration spews constantly. In fact, if you look further down on that link you'll find even more polls showing Americans want out of Iraq.

Yes, you are a liar. You are the one who kept claiming I was a freeper despite being told several times that I do not read that site. This is just ANOTHER example of you being a LIAR.

Regarding your first CNN link. That was typical bad CNN reporting and you just drank it up. "opposed" != "dissatisfied" The question they asked is what is important, yet you spin it to suit your lies. Go figure

As for your second link - Again, just because those supporting the current level does not mean "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." as you claim. I showed you that with the poll I cited. Partial withdraw does NOT mean opposition to the war, nor does it mean "people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq."
I support bringing the troop numbers down - but that sure as hell doesn't make me " oppose the continued presence in Iraq."

So again, liar, quit spinning polls to suit your lies, the FACTS don't support your claims.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur
"LIAR"? You wouldn't be a formerly banned troll now, would you? I seem to recall someone used to call me that quite a bit in the past and even capitalized it, too. Hmmm.


But, to dismiss you entirely:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/20/poll/

Nearly six in 10 Americans oppose the war in Iraq and a growing number of them are dissatisfied with the war on terrorism, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

And that was June.

Here's something newer from that communist, leftist rag, the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,..._20060915,00.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

A plurality of Americans has favored reducing troop levels in Iraq for most of the year. Now, 55% favor bringing soldiers home, while just 36% back Mr. Bush's position that current levels should be maintained to help secure peace and stability.p

Only 1/3 favor the current level. Who's in the majority, eh?

And, by your own link, it shows 2/3 want all or partial troop withdrawals. That's not a continued presence in the sense of "staying the course" that this administration spews constantly. In fact, if you look further down on that link you'll find even more polls showing Americans want out of Iraq.

Yes, you are a liar. You are the one who kept claiming I was a freeper despite being told several times that I do not read that site. This is just ANOTHER example of you being a LIAR.

Regarding your first CNN link. That was typical bad CNN reporting and you just drank it up. "opposed" != "dissatisfied" The question they asked is what is important, yet you spin it to suit your lies. Go figure

As for your second link - Again, just because those supporting the current level does not mean "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." as you claim. I showed you that with the poll I cited. Partial withdraw does NOT mean opposition to the war, nor does it mean "people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq."
I support bringing the troop numbers down - but that sure as hell doesn't make me " oppose the continued presence in Iraq."

So again, liar, quit spinning polls to suit your lies, the FACTS don't support your claims.

One doesn't have to be frequent that site in order to be a Freeper. You match their mindset perfectly.

And, who's spinning? Not me. I'm standing firmly still while the RWers spin and flail frantically to salvage the last bit of support for their Fortunate Son.

Quite sad, really.

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur
"LIAR"? You wouldn't be a formerly banned troll now, would you? I seem to recall someone used to call me that quite a bit in the past and even capitalized it, too. Hmmm.


But, to dismiss you entirely:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/20/poll/

Nearly six in 10 Americans oppose the war in Iraq and a growing number of them are dissatisfied with the war on terrorism, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

And that was June.

Here's something newer from that communist, leftist rag, the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,..._20060915,00.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

A plurality of Americans has favored reducing troop levels in Iraq for most of the year. Now, 55% favor bringing soldiers home, while just 36% back Mr. Bush's position that current levels should be maintained to help secure peace and stability.p

Only 1/3 favor the current level. Who's in the majority, eh?

And, by your own link, it shows 2/3 want all or partial troop withdrawals. That's not a continued presence in the sense of "staying the course" that this administration spews constantly. In fact, if you look further down on that link you'll find even more polls showing Americans want out of Iraq.

Yes, you are a liar. You are the one who kept claiming I was a freeper despite being told several times that I do not read that site. This is just ANOTHER example of you being a LIAR.

Regarding your first CNN link. That was typical bad CNN reporting and you just drank it up. "opposed" != "dissatisfied" The question they asked is what is important, yet you spin it to suit your lies. Go figure

As for your second link - Again, just because those supporting the current level does not mean "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." as you claim. I showed you that with the poll I cited. Partial withdraw does NOT mean opposition to the war, nor does it mean "people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq."
I support bringing the troop numbers down - but that sure as hell doesn't make me " oppose the continued presence in Iraq."

So again, liar, quit spinning polls to suit your lies, the FACTS don't support your claims.

One doesn't have to be frequent that site in order to be a Freeper. You match their mindset perfectly.

And, who's spinning? Not me. I'm standing firmly still while the RWers spin and flail frantically to salvage the last bit of support for their Fortunate Son.

Quite sad, really.

Ah, so if I or someone called you a liberal(which you are) you're fine with that? "You match their mindset perfectly"

Yes you are spinning things to support your lies. But it really doesn't matter anyway becasue just because a poll says something doesn't mean something is right or wrong, nor does it mean one side is right or wrong.

Now again, 1/3 does NOT mean you can make the claim that the "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." Only 30% want to withdraw all troops.
Sorry you can't handle the FACTS.


Now back to supporting the troops.

 

[conjur]

Back to supporting the troops? I never stopped. But, your continued spin is duly noted and summarily dismissed.

And, I'm not a liberal. Anti-Bush <> liberal. Nice try.

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Ah, so if I or someone called you a liberal(which you are) you're fine with that? "You match their mindset perfectly"

Yes you are spinning things to support your lies. But it really doesn't matter anyway becasue just because a poll says something doesn't mean something is right or wrong, nor does it mean one side is right or wrong.

Now again, 1/3 does NOT mean you can make the claim that the "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." Only 30% want to withdraw all troops.
Sorry you can't handle the FACTS.


Now back to supporting the troops.

You have a lot of nerve calling people liars when you support an administration which admittedly lied to gather support for an unjust war.

Also amazing that you assume all who oppose the war must therefore support pulling out all troops immediately.

The icing on the cake is telling others to grow up :laugh:

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: conjur
And, I'm not a liberal. Anti-Bush <> liberal. Nice try.

But... you must be! Otherwise, how could you possibly not like a warmongering murderer who lacks the intellect to tie his own shoes and wants to force his religion on everyone??

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: conjur
Back to supporting the troops? I never stopped. But, your continued spin is duly noted and summarily dismissed.

And, I'm not a liberal. Anti-Bush <> liberal. Nice try.

"You match their mindset perfectly" You said it.

The only spin is your lies about "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." But hey, everyone can see how you operate.

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur
Back to supporting the troops? I never stopped. But, your continued spin is duly noted and summarily dismissed.

And, I'm not a liberal. Anti-Bush <> liberal. Nice try.

"You match their mindset perfectly" You said it.

The only spin is your lies about "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." But hey, everyone can see how you operate.

Your assertion that the majority of people are in favor of continued presence is based on the assumption that all who don't favor it favor an immediate and total pullout instead. That's a fundamental flaw in your logic, and your inability to see shades of grey belie a scary lack of reasoning.

Edit: I just noticed your user name. The irony is killing me :laugh:

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: RBachman

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur
Back to supporting the troops? I never stopped. But, your continued spin is duly noted and summarily dismissed.

And, I'm not a liberal. Anti-Bush <> liberal. Nice try.

"You match their mindset perfectly" You said it.

The only spin is your lies about "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq." But hey, everyone can see how you operate.

Your assertion that the majority of people are in favor of continued presence is based on the assumption that all who don't favor it favor an immediate and total pullout instead. That's a fundamental flaw in your logic, and your inability to see shades of grey belie a scary lack of reasoning.

Edit: I just noticed your user name. The irony is killing me :laugh:

I never made such a claim. Conjur made a claim and it was refuted by the facts. Sorry you don't understand facts. Shades of grey do exist in many things but there are absolutes too. It seems too many times people go looking for the grey where there is only black and white. In this case conjur is trying to take grey and calling it black.

You find it ironic that my name is Grey Shaddon? I suppose you are a diamondback fan - no? :roll:

 

[arsbanned]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: EatSpam

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EatSpam
There's a rally in DC on Sept 24th with the topic of "Impeach Bush." If it weren't for that guy, the troops would be at home with their friends and family.

That's the way to support our troops.


Impeach Bush!



Fvck that faux patriotic crap. Esp. when it's run by a GOP PR firm out of California.

Yeah, as opposed to the communist funded/supported bush-hate rally.
Yeah, screw that BS about supporting the troops - the real mission is getting Bush - right? :roll:

You people never cease to amaze me with your hatred.

Can you provide any evidence to prove that the Impeach Bush rally is funded by communists?

P.S. The cold war ended in the 1980s.

A.N.S.W.E.R

Sept. 24 national demonstration initiated by A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition

Co-Sponsors

L.A. County Federation of Labor, Alliance for Just and Lasting Peace in the Philippines, Coalition for World Peace, Committee for Justice to Defend the LA 8, Free Palestine Alliance, Frente Unido de los Pueblos Americanos, Gabriella Network, Global Resistance Network, Global Women's Strike, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, International Socialist Organization, Islamic Shura Council of Southern California, KMB - Pro-People Youth, Korean Americans for Peace, Latino Movement USA, Muslim Students Association-West, National Council of Arab Americans, National Committee to Free the Cuban Five, National Lawyers Guild, Office of the Americas, Palestinian American Women?s Association, Party for Socialism and Liberation, Peace and Freedom Party, South Asian Network, United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA), U.S. Labor Against War, Youth & Student A.N.S.W.E.R.

Yes, Reagan ended the Cold War but unfortunately there are still those who still cling to Communism.

BTW, have you been to any of these "anti-war" rallies? I have - plenty of Communist literature there to collect. You are in deep denial if you don't think that it is part of this "movement".

Joe McCarthy? Is that you? AGAIN?

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: conjur
But, your continued spin is duly noted and summarily dismissed.

Anyone else see the glaring irony here?

 

[arsbanned]

Originally posted by: cwjerome

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Chicken, you're fun to hassle

Another admitted troll in this forum?

Why am I not surprised?

I noticed he pops up in random threads and discusses burning the American flag a lot.

So what?

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
I never made such a claim. Conjur made a claim and it was refuted by the facts. Sorry you don't understand facts. Shades of grey do exist in many things but there are absolutes too. It seems too many times people go looking for the grey where there is only black and white. In this case conjur is trying to take grey and calling it black.

You find it ironic that my name is Grey Shaddon? I suppose you are a diamondback fan - no? :roll:

You made such a claim in asserting that those who favor fewer troops are in favor of our continued presence, when in fact the logical conclusion is that they favor a slow pullout. Yes, I find it ironic that your user name is "ShadesOfGrey" when you see this issue only in black & white.

 

[cwjerome]

Originally posted by: arsbanned

Originally posted by: cwjerome

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Chicken, you're fun to hassle

Another admitted troll in this forum?

Why am I not surprised?

I noticed he pops up in random threads and discusses burning the American flag a lot.

So what?

Just a little observation over this dude's troll-like fixation.

So?

 

[ShadesOfGrey]

Originally posted by: RBachman

Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
I never made such a claim. Conjur made a claim and it was refuted by the facts. Sorry you don't understand facts. Shades of grey do exist in many things but there are absolutes too. It seems too many times people go looking for the grey where there is only black and white. In this case conjur is trying to take grey and calling it black.

You find it ironic that my name is Grey Shaddon? I suppose you are a diamondback fan - no? :roll:

You made such a claim in asserting that those who favor fewer troops are in favor of our continued presence, when in fact the logical conclusion is that they favor a slow pullout. Yes, I find it ironic that your user name is "ShadesOfGrey" when you see this issue only in black & white.

No, what I did was refute the claim that conjur made. The facts show that only ~1/3 support a full withdraw - which doesn't match conjur's claim that a "MAJORITY of people now oppose the continued presence in Iraq."

You can speculate all you want about what the poll means or what the people thought while responding to the poll but that's all it is - speculation. The FACTS however don't support conjur's claim.

Hehe, again you are wrong. I see this question as a somewhat grey issue -thus I refuted conjur's claim and his attempt to make it a black/white issue. You seem to be a bit confused - basically totally backwards to reality.

Again, my name is Grey Shaddon - deal with it.