Shouldn't the ideal Rambo/Jason Bourne/Superhero be a dwarf?

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
8,816
55
106
#1
Little people would be harder to hit.

They look fast when running even if they aren't really going fast...
 
Feb 26, 2006
51,975
600
126
#4
Did you forget the movie Jack Reacher was a midget?
As compared to thee Jack Reacher in the novels...who was 6'-5".

I guess a midget would work as Bourne...if you only wanted to kneecap someone...
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
17,938
333
126
#5
They're supposed to to be able to jump far and reach long distances to keep someone from falling off a cliff

Played too much GoldenEye on the N64.
Ah I have fond memories of my friends and I covering maps with proximity mines. First to die gets to clear spawn points with their suddenly lifeless bodies
 
Oct 10, 1999
24,932
417
126
#6
Little people would be harder to hit.

They look fast when running even if they aren't really going fast...
Stallone and Damon are only 5"10. they practically are little people.
 

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
3,379
432
136
#7
If that were the case, lots of people here should consider becoming spies/mercenaries.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
75,105
498
126
#8
Little people would be harder to hit.

They look fast when running even if they aren't really going fast...

So they need to carry around a step ladder so they can reach the bad guy's neck to break it?
 
Feb 26, 2006
51,975
600
126
#10
Maybe we should ask Shortylickens to weigh in on this...
 
Aug 10, 2001
11,384
38
91
#11
Stallone and Damon are only 5"10. they practically are little people.
And Tom Cruise is like what... 2"?
(So every movie he has ever been in they had to hire midgets to make him look halfway normal)
 
Jul 13, 2005
26,087
734
126
#15
Actually I would say mayne`ds name comes to mind as the ultimate super hero!!
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS