• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should we stop using the terms Progressive/Interlaced?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So we still say stuff like "Game in 1080p" or "Monitor supports 1080p"

Since we are, for the most part, all utilizing LCD or plasma screens, isn't saying something like that as using "progressive scan" technology, actually incorrect?

Aren't interlacing/progressive scans old tech used in CRT's?

Can't we just say (1920x1080 resolution monitor) (1280x720 resolution monitor)

Isn't 1080p a lot easier to say than "1920x1080 resolution monitor" or whatever the hell?
 
Wow, that is confusing...so 1080i could be anything :| Why not just send a fucking regular signal? Is it because CRT tv's still exist on the marketplace?
Bandwidth I'd imagine. 1080P video, even compressed still eats up a sizeable chunk of data even by today's standards.
 
I remember long ago saying 1080p was the only way when folks were stressing over a tv.

Damn it feels good to be a gangsta

The year is now 2014
 
Give me your address.

I'll send a box and a prepaid FedEx call tag.

lol

the only reason she would let me get a new tv was to let her parents finally experience the substantial difference in quality.

won't let me pawn it off to a bunch a' nerds 🙁



Ahhhh "frame interpolation" - is that the extremely weird soap-opera effect? It drive's me CRAZY. I'm the guy who says, turn that shit off, and everyone else is like, I don't see what you are talking about.
 
Back
Top