Total hogwash. Only the truly delusional could say such a thing.
No, only the truly delusional would believe that a privileged, super wealthy aristocrat like Roosevelt, a man who presided over a government that imprisoned 100,000+ totally innocent U.S. citizens of Japanese descent in concentration/internment camps, was somehow driven by a desire to stand up on behalf of the unwashed masses against the wealthy elites who financed his campaign.
Here's what Roosevelt's own son-in-law, Curtis Dall, said about him:
"For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.
"The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.
The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."
The rest is just as delusional. People of great wealth simply have private armies when there is weak govt, because they can, because there's no organized force to stop them from doing so.
This situation is far, far worse under government, though. With a Big Government in place, all people of great wealth have to do is buy up the media, control the dissemination of information, and groom their own controlled politicians, which they then market to the public as false choice Left (Obama) and false choice Right (Romney). In this arrangement, people of great wealth not only control public policy, but they also control the military.
Now tell me, which situation is worse for the people? Having to oppose smaller, less technologically advanced private armies, or the full, coordinated might of the U.S. military and its 500 billion dollar budgets?