• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should they let Saddam starve to death?

MichaelD

Lifer
Just a ploy to keep the sham of a trial from continuing.

Sure; we all know how the trial will end up. Personally, I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap. By giving him a "trial", they gave him free license to stall the inevitable for as long as possible. B.S.

And I don't like P&N; for me to go there would be like going to my son's mother's house with a cake. It just ain't gonna happen.
 
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Personally, I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap.

I think it's sad that you can feel this way. Even the worst criminals deserve a fair trial.
 
I'm sure the its pretty painful to feel your body eat it self to death.


Screw em', he deserve it.

Edit - I see they gave him a feeding tube. Its not a hunger strike anymore. If he doesn't want to finish this trail and go to jail like a good little boy, then he can stay in a hospital bed forever, not being able to move a limb.
 
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Personally, I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap.

I think it's sad that you can feel this way. Even the worst criminals deserve a fair trial.

 
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Just a ploy to keep the sham of a trial from continuing.

Sure; we all know how the trial will end up. Personally, I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap. By giving him a "trial", they gave him free license to stall the inevitable for as long as possible. B.S.

And I don't like P&N; for me to go there would be like going to my son's mother's house with a cake. It just ain't gonna happen.

I would rather just be shot in the head rather than suffer just to wait for an inevitable death.
 
Originally posted by: SSP
I'm sure the its pretty painful to feel your body eat it self to death.


Screw em', he deserve it.

Edit - I see they gave him a feeding tube. Its not a hunger strike anymore. If he doesn't want to finish this trail and go to jail like a good little boy, then he can stay in a hospital bed forever, not being able to move a limb.

Hopefully they put it up through his nose down into his stomach. Best way imho
 
Originally posted by: MichaelD

I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap.

Nah, too good for him. I think 'eye for an eye' is pretty appropriate here. They should torture him within an inch of his life before they kill him. That was good enough for his victims.

 
Originally posted by: Taggart
Originally posted by: MichaelD

I think they should've just shot him in the head the second they found him and avoided all this crap.

Nah, too good for him. I think 'eye for an eye' is pretty appropriate here. They should torture him within an inch of his life before they kill him. That was good enough for his victims.

If we did what you suggest, we would be no better than him.
 
Back
Top