• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should the US government be able to invade your home at will?

T

tec699

Banned
I believe they should because we are fighting terrorist. And to be honest if you disagree with this then you should maybe find another place to live.

just my opinion.
 
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
 
Originally posted by: tec699
I believe they should because we are fighting terrorist. And to be honest if you disagree with this then you should maybe find another place to live.

just my opinion.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should be the one to find another place to live, as apparently you don't believe in the Constitution or Bill of Rights which our country is founded on.
 
Originally posted by: Amused
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Click to expand...

So I guess you want to give all the power to the terrorist that are trying to take down this great country?
 
Sure, they have the right to invade your home...but ONLY with the proper warrant.

And honestly, Michael Jackson seems a more real threat to me than "teh terrorist!!!11!"
 
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: Amused
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Click to expand...

So I guess you want to give all the power to the terrorist that are trying to take down this great country?
Click to expand...

I smell a devil's advocate.

I'm not biting.
 
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: Amused
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Click to expand...

So I guess you want to give all the power to the terrorist that are trying to take down this great country?
Click to expand...

So I guess you think they should just randomly enter every house on the chance there might be a terrorist, rather than using intelligence and research to see if maybe there's a terrorist there first? Gee, wouldn't it have been awesome to have lived in Hitler's Germany?
 
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: Amused
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Click to expand...

So I guess you want to give all the power to the terrorist that are trying to take down this great country?
Click to expand...

Not everyone is a terrorist. Those who are can be identified via due process, and their houses "invaded" once probable cause has been found.

Now please quit being stupid.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: tec699
I believe they should because we are fighting terrorist. And to be honest if you disagree with this then you should maybe find another place to live.

just my opinion.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should be the one to find another place to live, as apparently you don't believe in the Constitution or Bill of Rights which our country is founded on.
Click to expand...

:thumbsup: hmmm.. i seem to remember a war we fought b/c of an overactive gov't... in the 1700s ... look it up.
 
Originally posted by: tec699
I believe they should because we are fighting terrorist. And to be honest if you disagree with this then you should maybe find another place to live.

just my opinion.
Click to expand...

that is one of the most obsurd things i have ever read. i am speechless and tec, you belong in cuba
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: Amused
No

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Click to expand...

So I guess you want to give all the power to the terrorist that are trying to take down this great country?
Click to expand...

I smell a devil's advocate.

I'm not biting.
Click to expand...

heh smelt the same.
 
Originally posted by: tec699
I believe they should because we are fighting terrorist. And to be honest if you disagree with this then you should maybe find another place to live.

just my opinion.
Click to expand...

Your name wouldn't happen to be "George Bush", "Dick Cheney", "John Ashcroft", or "Donald Rumsfeld", would it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top