I'd say no; simply because the State is an irrational agent so only those at the top get to decide who is an enemy and who is an ally of the united States. Some executives wouldn't take advantage of treason legislation, but most would. For example, it was good for liberty that Dick cheney never became President as he was a much more efficient authoritarian than Bush ever could've been (and he probably supported more surveillance at home than Bush did). And then some could just as easily say Dick Cheney was treasonous. He may have used those who trusted him and he hasn't even appeared all that satisfied; he contained no original thought and he didn't fear the muslims that much because he supported Bill Clinton's Admin going after Slobodan Milosevic so he could gain more cash. Cheney had reason, but Bush seemed scared which was his excuse; Cheney's reasoning seemed as unoriginal and possibly even more selfish than Bush's excuses for more security. i also doubt dick cheney paid much in wages when he was CEO of Haliburton; I know I couldn't be any better and no one would've wanted the crap Haliburton sold if we were in a free society. Dick Cheney can always realize that his friends could take care of him rather than him working.
And please always, always remember that high Unemployment can be very healthy as it allows for private charity provided decentralization of tender (confederation govt and all the member republics may create tender while the people in each republic are free to use private mediums of exchange), public revenues from sale of public assets only, and almost no public spending.
Anyway, treason legislation is like counterfeiting legislation--if the State didn't create legal tender, then there nothing that could be centrally devalued. Likewise, if the State didn't have enemies, then there could be no treason.
And please always, always remember that high Unemployment can be very healthy as it allows for private charity provided decentralization of tender (confederation govt and all the member republics may create tender while the people in each republic are free to use private mediums of exchange), public revenues from sale of public assets only, and almost no public spending.
Anyway, treason legislation is like counterfeiting legislation--if the State didn't create legal tender, then there nothing that could be centrally devalued. Likewise, if the State didn't have enemies, then there could be no treason.