- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 197
- 106
For once lets have an honest and open discussion.
In this case, it is a persons right to privacy vs the publics right to know.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rosecutors-report-released-today-details.html
Personally, I think the upper class of the area does not want to face that this kind of violence could happen to them. Shootings like this only happen in the ghetto,,,, right?
While I respect a persons right to privacy, the people doing the investigating are on the public payroll. And since they are paid by the public, should the public have a right to know what the investigators found?
In this case, it is a persons right to privacy vs the publics right to know.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rosecutors-report-released-today-details.html
The lead investigator State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky III, who has gone to court to fight the release of 911 tapes, consulted privately with victims' families on what might be included in the report and resisted calls from Connecticut's governor to divulge more information sooner.
Personally, I think the upper class of the area does not want to face that this kind of violence could happen to them. Shootings like this only happen in the ghetto,,,, right?
While I respect a persons right to privacy, the people doing the investigating are on the public payroll. And since they are paid by the public, should the public have a right to know what the investigators found?