Should people who get gov. handouts have to take a drug test?

SAWYER

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
16,742
42
91
I saw this article and comment on another board and thought it was fairly interesting and I have never thought of this...
This was written by a construction worker in Fort MacMurray, Alberta, Canada

He sure makes a lot of sense.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit..
In order to earn that pay cheque, I work on a rig site for a Fort Mac construction project.

I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem.

What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have
to pass a urine test.

Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare cheque because I have to pass one to earn it
for them?

Please understand -- I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.

I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their ass drinking beer and smoking dope. Could you imagine how much money the country would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance cheque?


Something has to change in this country, and soon!!!

If I have to take one to work and pay taxes then people should take one to get benefits. That seems to me to be simple logic.
 

venkman

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,950
11
81
Nice idea in theory. The administration costs would probably cancel out any benefits from the lower "user base".
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: venkman
Nice idea in theory. The administration costs would probably cancel out any benefits from the lower "user base".

yeah i have to agree. but part of me don't care if it does not gain any extra money. just the fact that getting drug abusers off would be enough for me.


i really think welfare needs a overhaul. i have no trouble someone who needs it getting it. what pisses me off are those that abuse it.
 

GRIFFIN1

Golden Member
Nov 10, 1999
1,403
6
81
I would like to see mandatory birth control and a suspension of voting rights.
 

Dr. Detroit

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2004
8,282
743
126
of course they should

Pretty hard to get a job when your drug using and many menial jobs require a drug test.



 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Sawyer

If I have to take one to work and pay taxes then people should take one to get benefits. That seems to me to be simple logic.

I don't know about Canada's laws, but here in the US the government doesn't require you to pass a drug test to get a job (although it probably does if you get a government job). It's up to the employer.

The thing is, most of those receiving government handouts have kids. How do you punish the parents for using drugs without hurting the kids? And why do we need to punish people for using drugs? Granted it's a waste of money, but they could also use that money to buy alcohol legally.
 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: venkman
Nice idea in theory. The administration costs would probably cancel out any benefits from the lower "user base".

yeah i have to agree. but part of me don't care if it does not gain any extra money. just the fact that getting drug abusers off would be enough for me.


i really think welfare needs a overhaul. i have no trouble someone who needs it getting it. what pisses me off are those that abuse it.

Some (very quick) googling showed that the average welfare benefits for a family of 3 was ~$7000 a year in money and food stamps in 1992. It's probably more than that now, but let's go with that number. Even after administration costs 2 urine tests couldn't possibly cost $7000...right?
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: GRIFFIN1
I would like to see mandatory birth control and a suspension of voting rights.
Would you like to bring back segregation as well?
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,252
403
126
Uh no. F it, let's make the entire population take drug tests, that'll stop people from doing drugs.
 

tRaptor

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2002
1,227
1
0
Originally posted by: GRIFFIN1
I would like to see mandatory birth control and a suspension of voting rights.

I don't agree on you on voting rights, but I believe that having children should be thought of as a privilege, not a right. Children are expensive, the rest of us should not be picking up the slack because you didn't think about the cost.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,189
51,752
136
No, that would be stupid. This is just some sort of poorly thought out combination of welfare mythology and knee jerk anti drug reactions.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
No.

First, it would only increase the public cost of the "handouts."
Second, the war on drugs was failure 20 years ago, why keep beating the dead horse?
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,637
10,055
146
Originally posted by: herm0016
yea, they should. i like the required birth control idea too.

Nazis lost WWll. Perhaps North Korea for you?

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,189
51,752
136
Originally posted by: Vic
No.

First, it would only increase the public cost of the "handouts."
Second, the war on drugs was failure 20 years ago, why keep beating the dead horse?

That reminds me of one of my all time favorite Onion headlines: something like "Drug war over: Drugs win."
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: RandomFool
It'd be nice but probably pretty costly too. I'd settle for some basic profiling.

Seeing how minorities have a higher per capita rate of drug abuse, profiling will never happen. Its racist.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,345
5,910
126
No. It's simple Scapegoating and totally ignores the vast majority of "Illegal" Drug Users, those that are Employed.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,189
51,752
136
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: RandomFool
It'd be nice but probably pretty costly too. I'd settle for some basic profiling.

Seeing how minorities have a higher per capita rate of drug abuse, profiling will never happen. Its racist.

You sure about that?

EDIT: Drug use is pretty consistent between most minorities and whites. (except for those crazy Asians) The fact that people think that way without any proof though is pretty racist.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,614
6,447
126
Not only should they not require a urine test, they should pass out all the free drugs anybody wants.