SaDiZTiKStyLeZ
Lifer
- Apr 12, 2010
- 10,510
- 10
- 0
you can always lose weight. you can never erase the scars taking a child away from their parents causes. If we want to breed a generation of hateful psychopaths this seems like a good program.
In extreme cases is a key part of that stipulation. If you've got a 12 year old that weighs 200 pounds, it's gone beyond poor parenting. That kid either needs to be hospitalized for whatever extreme condition he has or removed from his parents care for the criminal neglect they've inflicted on him.
lol. what a joke.
Talk about fucking up a kid for life, your too fat so we are taking you away from your parents and sticking you in Foster care where you are more likely to be physically and sexually abused.
I'd argue that allowing a child to become dangerously obese is a form of abuse itself.
I think the nannies and their government goon squad should fuck off.
I would rather the government demand food production place produce better foods than crappy snacks with god knows what in them. Maybe if we stop producing shit we wont look and feel like shit. Plus food education can go a long way for these people.
I think it depends. Allowing and helping your child be obese is not good at all. This is a tough one.
Childhood obesity is a form of abuse. Other than a few medical conditions there is no reason why a child should be obese and parents need to be held accountable. My son had gained more weight than either of us wanted so we implemented a food plan and he lost the weight. I dont see why this is such a hard thing for other parents to do...
Childhood obesity is a form of abuse. Other than a few medical conditions there is no reason why a child should be obese and parents need to be held accountable. My son had gained more weight than either of us wanted so we implemented a food plan and he lost the weight. I dont see why this is such a hard thing for other parents to do...
Easy:
1)The government promotes fattening diets.
2)Healthy foods are more expensive than healthy foods
3)fixed income families(read: welfare/food stamps) shop for volume not quality.
ssshhhhh Big Brother is watching.
If your child is over weight, a bully, too thin, bad teeth, smells..............it's in the best interest of the child, to remove them and place them in a better home setting. But then you will also have to watch the parents in those homes, that smoke, drink, swear, or are over weight themselves. But if we are considering what is best for the child, the "physical aspects" shouldn't be our limiting factor. Are there genetic issues we should be aware of, we can't dictate that they attend a specific church, but they should be aware of the different religions, so perhaps we should mandate that they regularily attend a church (as long as it WASP based).
Sorry, for 13 years we were a foster home, with more then 40 children passing through our doors; some for just a night, others we have adopted, and more return to update their initials and date to the well cluttered door jambs. Each year the state/feds added more "guidelines" and requirements, at the same time often lamenting the fact that there are so few parents that want to become foster parents. We have a large enough problem with children that are being physically abused/neglected, without adding "over weight" to the list of reasons to remove a child.
And I definitely agree with an earlier post; we need a liscense to drive, tests to purchase pistols, and have age restrictions for purchasing alcohol. But what laws are out there regarding an individual's choice of when to have a child? Perhaps Big Brother views driving a car as more deadly then having a child?
damn....now my blood pressure is wrecked for the day. Idiots.
lol u knew what i mean
