• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should of used Linux

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Grammar Nazi: It's "Should HAVE", not "Should OF".

English, motherfvcker.. Do you SPEAK IT?
Click to expand...


This is the one reason why I came into this thread!

He could also use the contraction version "should've" Which is probably what he was shooting for.
 
Originally posted by: jdini76
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Grammar Nazi: It's "Should HAVE", not "Should OF".

English, motherfvcker.. Do you SPEAK IT?
Click to expand...


This is the one reason why I came into this thread!

He could also use the contraction version "should've" Which is probably what he was shooting for.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily shooting for, just not intelligent enough to realize that saying "should-uv" is spelled "should've" which is a contraction of "should have." Lots of people make that mistake. Granted they're young and haven't really taken any English classes because they're too young to start school, but hey... it's all good...
 
Originally posted by: jdini76
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Grammar Nazi: It's "Should HAVE", not "Should OF".

English, motherfvcker.. Do you SPEAK IT?
Click to expand...


This is the one reason why I came into this thread!

He could also use the contraction version "should've" Which is probably what he was shooting for.
Click to expand...

me too 😱
 
Reminds me I was at Shaws Supermarket the other day at the self-checkout and one of the screens was at a windows desktop...
 
Originally posted by: jdini76
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Grammar Nazi: It's "Should HAVE", not "Should OF".

English, motherfvcker.. Do you SPEAK IT?
Click to expand...


This is the one reason why I came into this thread!

He could also use the contraction version "should've" Which is probably what he was shooting for.
Click to expand...

the complete ignorance of "should of" never fails to amaze me.
 
Originally posted by: oniq
Reminds me I was at Shaws Supermarket the other day at the self-checkout and one of the screens was at a windows desktop...
Click to expand...

You'd be surprised how many point-of-sale systems are Windows-driven.
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: oniq
Reminds me I was at Shaws Supermarket the other day at the self-checkout and one of the screens was at a windows desktop...
Click to expand...

You'd be surprised how many point-of-sale systems are Windows-driven.
Click to expand...

Point Of Sale systems are windows driven? BWUAHAHAHA - I love it!
 
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: oniq
Reminds me I was at Shaws Supermarket the other day at the self-checkout and one of the screens was at a windows desktop...
Click to expand...

You'd be surprised how many point-of-sale systems are Windows-driven.
Click to expand...

Point Of Sale systems are windows driven? BWUAHAHAHA - I love it!
Click to expand...

I refrained from using the acronym for this reason 🙂
 
<sarcasm>Anyone else get a polite, "Hey, how are ya?" from this guy via PM?</scarcasm>

I did. He's well versed in slang English, but no so much so in proper English.
 
"should have"/"should've"

ur inglish sux foo

and that's not windows's fault. blame the person who did that ad.
 
Originally posted by: Rogue
<sarcasm>Anyone else get a polite, "Hey, how are ya?" from this guy via PM?</scarcasm>

I did. He's well versed in slang English, but no so much so in proper English.
Click to expand...

LOL! Yep, sure did! :beer:😀 I think he's a tad upset..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top