Should men who randomly impregnate women be stored on a national database?

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,595
2,586
126
You hear about it all the time. These "players" go around having sex with as many women as possible making all kinds of promises but when she gets pregnant its never his. He changes his cell phone number, maybe moves to another place, etc.

Should a national database of these men be kept to prevent them from becomming 'baby daddys' beyond a certain point? Lets say after you have done this more than twice you can be arrested and forced to work for the state making plates to pay child support. That or maybe leather goods, woodwork, produce, whatever. Just stop making welfare babys.

I know the majority of these scoundrels know how babby is formed and how girl get pregnant but yet always blame the woman. Or do we just let these guys keep having 20 or 30 children+ and never hold them accountable?


Edit: According to poll results there doesnt seem to be much support for sending guys to jail who promise to stick around only to leave after convincing her to get pregnant. How about this idea:

Sally Hotpants is interested in a new guy who seems very loving and wants her to have his 'chilren'. But she is unsure of his true convictions despite all his promises. So she goes online to the NATIONAL IMPREGNATOR DATABASE to check to see if this isnt Romeo 'Angel Eyes' Santiagos first time at the rodeo. She sees Romeos name on the list and finds out he has seven children with seven different women. She decides to break it off as quickly as possible!! Isnt that beneficial to Sally? :heart:
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
:confused:

Seriously? Why is the man the only one accountable?

It takes two to tango. While the man should wear a condom, it was the woman who let him penetrate her without one. If she doesn't want a baby, there are options for her. Yes, that includes abortion. It also includes things like the morning after pill or regular birth control.

Is this a troll post, or what? lol
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,595
2,586
126
Originally posted by: Eli
:confused:

Seriously? Why is the man the only one accountable?

It takes two to tango. While the man should wear a condom, it was the woman who let him penetrate her without one. If she doesn't want a baby, there are options for her. Yes, that includes abortion. It also includes things like the morning after pill.

I know there are alot of women (usually under 25) who simply want a child even if the father has no intention of staying. So they are unlikely to have that child count against the impregnator.

However, in most male / female relationships, its the man who is the initiator especially the kind I was thinking about when I made this thread. They have no other objective but to spread their seed from here to Kalamazoo and back without regard to their offspring.

That kind of thinking needs to stop and I think spending some time in the cooler might help. :)
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Eli
:confused:

Seriously? Why is the man the only one accountable?

It takes two to tango. While the man should wear a condom, it was the woman who let him penetrate her without one. If she doesn't want a baby, there are options for her. Yes, that includes abortion. It also includes things like the morning after pill.

I know there are alot of women (usually under 25) who simply want a child even if the father has no intention of staying. So they are unlikely to have that child count against the impregnator.

However, in most male / female relationships, its the man who is the initiator especially the kind I was thinking about when I made this thread. They have no other objective but to spread their seed from here to Kalamazoo and back without regard to their offspring.

That kind of thinking needs to stop and I think spending some time in the cooler might help. :)

O hai feminist
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Eli
:confused:

Seriously? Why is the man the only one accountable?

It takes two to tango. While the man should wear a condom, it was the woman who let him penetrate her without one. If she doesn't want a baby, there are options for her. Yes, that includes abortion. It also includes things like the morning after pill.

I know there are alot of women (usually under 25) who simply want a child even if the father has no intention of staying. So they are unlikely to have that child count against the impregnator.

However, in most male / female relationships, its the man who is the initiator especially the kind I was thinking about when I made this thread. They have no other objective but to spread their seed from here to Kalamazoo and back without regard to their offspring.

That kind of thinking needs to stop and I think spending some time in the cooler might help. :)

:confused:

What planet are you from, man? lol

Like I said, it takes two to tango. That is all that matters. Unless we are talking about rape, this discussion is silly.

Women have testosterone flowing through their veins. They get horny. They want teh c0ck.

Absolving them of fault for becoming pregnant is absolutely insane. If anything, it is up to them whether they become pregnant or not. If they don't force the man to wear a condom, they are perfectly capable of taking birth control or getting the morning after pill.

:confused::confused:
 

Ciber

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2000
2,531
30
91
I have a better idea, We should have child bearing contracts, You're not responsible for the woman having a baby if you didn't sign a formal agreement with her. Why should you get screwed if she can't manage *HER OWN BODY* and just decides to have it... you want it, you deal with it :p.

They have so many ways to prevent having a baby, that there is really no way to have one unless you ***WANT*** to have it.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
What the HELL?! This thread is ridiculousness.

Women have a choice in having sex / becoming pregnant / giving birth.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Ciber
I have a better idea, We should have child bearing contracts, You're not responsible for the woman having a baby if you didn't sign a formal agreement with her. Why should you get screwed if she can't manage *HER OWN BODY* and just decides to have it... you want it, you deal with it :p.

They have so many ways to prevent having a baby, that there is really no way to have one unless you ***WANT*** to have it.

Would keep people out of our courts with their trashy lifestyles...
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Ok, I changed it. No jail time, but we keep names on a database only. :thumbsup:

I guess. I don't think this is as big of a problem as you think.

Sure, there are "players" out there that will say anything to a woman to get her in the sack... but they are the minority. And in reality, if a woman is willing to sleep with a man on the first date, all she really wanted was some action also.

It is not hard to find booty. As I said, women want sex almost as much as men do.

In my opinion, the woman should be held to a higher standard since she is the one in control of her own body. She has to say yes. She has to allow the man to not wear a condom. She has to chose whether to take birth control or use other contraceptive methods, and in the event that she does become pregnant she has to chose whether to carry the child to term.

In short, I really don't understand where you're coming from. Time to face reality; girls' shit stinks too. They don't belong on a pedestal.

 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
no, woman controls contraception. the pill and later on abortion. if she doesn't want a baby, she can stop it cold 100%.

anyways if a woman is that poor a judge a character the blame is at least 50% on her. u sleep with a douchbag and then bring his baby into the world..furthering their douchy genes..i think thats far worse a crime than just knocking someone up.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,595
2,586
126
Originally posted by: scott
Men carry responsibility.

Any animal can randomly impregnate women without accepting responsibility.

So they are not "men." Just bozos seeking self gratification w/o regard to who gets hurt.

That's a million miles away from how a MAN acts.


I am a man.

Join me.

Well put, we need to promote responsibility in society and stop this 'anything goes' attitude in the name of tolerance and understanding.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Yea and the women have no responsibility as well? The woman has the right to get her childsupport. Felix you're obviously bitter which blurs your view on this. A man can have sex and if he has kids by it, he needs to pay his childsupport nothing more. Why would we need somedata base for this? The woman needs to seek courtordered child support. Also I find it funny that you say we need to promote responsibility well why did the woman just open up her legs right away for some random guy and not use any bc and not demand the man where some? That's a lack of responsibility to me. Nice try though.
 
May 13, 2009
12,333
612
126
Why do I get the impression "the player" is a minority. Maybe because his chidren are chilren and nickname is angel eyes Gomez. Let me guess what a "players" fav food is fried chicken
 

episodic

Lifer
Feb 7, 2004
11,088
2
81
Only if we create a database with the names of all the women that randomly get impregnated by men.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
National registries/databases are never a good idea, not matter what the are intended for. They will always lead to functional creep. Exhibit A: Sex offender registries.