It uses less power but creates more heat!
How does this work, magic of course!
Well, if you want to get all technical, it's really not creating more heat. It's just doing a worse job of dissipating less heat. Regardless, Sandy for the win!![]()
I'd take IB over SB if I was buying right now :\
Meanwhile, at AMD
"Do you think we will be able to beat an already inferior 2009 Phenom II 6-core processor with our next release?"
Meanwhile, at Intel:
"We have 22nm out the door and functional, ready to fill the channel!"
Should they just cancel IB and sell SB chips while they refine 22nm and get Haswell right?
I mean, what's the point of it when people can't get it to 5 GHZ without generating a ton of heat?
I'm not happy with that.Because not everyone wants or needs to clock the thing out the wazoo, most people are happy at stock or like myself, happy with a moderate overclock of say 4.0ghz
I'm not happy with that.
Pretty soon we will all be CPU limited at 5ghz. Certainly within the reasonable lifespan of these chips we will.
ROFLno worries
i made it
i hit 5.0 ghz with ivy brigde
it was all about cooling efficiensy
with the following water cooling setup
thew temps are at 30c max
http://www.visitingdc.com/images/hoover-dam-directions.jpg
long live intel
things were not that hot when intel had a competition from amd lol
ao now that amd is back intel is catching amd in heat envelope!?!?!??
For that usage pattern Ivy is 77w vs 95w for the same thing on the Sandy Bridge platform.I dont get it. All this talk about 4.5GHz but I still cant find any info on what to expect out of systems that pull 75 watts max from the wall. I want to know how much faster they can be.
When you got kids forgetting to exit the browser, leaving flash sitting there running at 60% of 2 cores and pulling 130 watts from the wall, it starts to add up.
Or if you have computers that stubbornly refuse to go to sleep... again it adds up.
60 watts is the maximum power envelope I am aiming for with a casual (non 3D gaming) general purpose pc. I want to know how ib hits that spot.
I just said this joke aloud because it amused me... unfortunately my mind slipped and i ended it like this: "4.5 ghz ought to be enough for anypony..."4.5 Ghz should be enough for anyone.
I'm not happy with that.
Pretty soon we will all be CPU limited at 5ghz. Certainly within the reasonable lifespan of these chips we will.
no worries
i made it
i hit 5.0 ghz with ivy brigde
it was all about cooling efficiensy
with the following water cooling setup
thew temps are at 30c max
http://www.visitingdc.com/images/hoover-dam-directions.jpg
long live intel
things were not that hot when intel had a competition from amd lol
so now that amd is back intel is catching amd in heat envelope!?!?!??
it took how many generations for intel to make a cpu hotter than buldozer?!?!?
but now intel rules all ascpects
more power
more efficiency
less watt
more heat