- Sep 10, 2001
- 12,348
- 1
- 81
This may seem like a really elementary question, but I wanted to be sure that I'm using the right method for reporting the 'average' of my measurements. Basically, I've measured the diameter of an object four times in four different meridians and I want to know the 'average' or 'equivalent' diameter of the object. It turns out that, for my particular case, the values are, for all intents and purposes, identical, but I want to be sure that I report the correct method.
I did a little digging on the various uses of these means, but it's not readily apparent (to me at least
) which is the right one to use.
This page probably gives the most thorough description. I tried MathWorld, but it doesn't really say when to use the different means, just how to compute them.
Based on this explanation from the above link:
I did a little digging on the various uses of these means, but it's not readily apparent (to me at least
This page probably gives the most thorough description. I tried MathWorld, but it doesn't really say when to use the different means, just how to compute them.
Based on this explanation from the above link:
This leads me to believe that the arithmetic mean is the correct choice, since I am interested in the right length of the diameter that would sum to the total of my four measurements. Am I right? One paper that performed a similar experiment used the geometric mean, which is why this issue came up.Suppose that we have two quantities, A and B. Taking their arithmetic mean we get the number (A+B)/2 which can be interpreted in a number of ways. One interpretation (probably the most common) is that this quantity is the midpoint of the two numbers viewed as points on a line.
Now suppose that we have a rectangle with sides of lengths A and B. The arithmetic mean can also be interpreted as the length of the sides of a square whose perimeter is the same as our rectangle. Similarly, the geometric mean is the length of the sides of a square which has the same area as our rectangle.