- May 19, 2011
- 20,376
- 15,059
- 136
I have the feeling the answer is no, but I'm still curious about it.
I've read LOTR and The Hobbit multiple times as a teen. I enjoyed the Bakshi version of LOTR (despite its flaws, which are numerous), then along came Peter Jackson's trilogy which I dislike fairly intensely for reasons such as its hollywoodification of the story. It turned me off reading LOTR again for a while and by the time I considered reading it again, I had read other stuff which also served to highlight weaknesses of Tolkien's writing style (e.g. the characters are largely cardboard cut-outs with little development). There are still things I love about Tolkien's style such as the feeling of history I remember, but I also remember pacing issues in the story. Overall, I haven't had the enthusiasm to read LOTR again.
I haven't watched the Hobbit movies, they were a Peter Jackson job again (kinda, I know), and I've heard nothing encouraging about them.
I watched Rings of Power. It gets a lot of flack, most notably what people consider to be pacing issues, yet to me fits in perfectly with Tolkien's style and IMO it also hits the right tone with regard to Tolkien's feeling of history. I liked the first season quite a bit, another feeling I got when watching it was like having experienced years of bad Star Wars movies, along comes 'Rogue One' as a breath of fresh air. People also critique RoP for not being true to the books, but I'm wondering where this criticism comes from: Peter Jackson trilogy lovers? LOL. People who criticise its pacing yet survived reading The Silmarillion? My impression of The Silmarillion from opinions of peers/the Internet is that it's pretty dry reading even in comparison to LOTR.
I've read LOTR and The Hobbit multiple times as a teen. I enjoyed the Bakshi version of LOTR (despite its flaws, which are numerous), then along came Peter Jackson's trilogy which I dislike fairly intensely for reasons such as its hollywoodification of the story. It turned me off reading LOTR again for a while and by the time I considered reading it again, I had read other stuff which also served to highlight weaknesses of Tolkien's writing style (e.g. the characters are largely cardboard cut-outs with little development). There are still things I love about Tolkien's style such as the feeling of history I remember, but I also remember pacing issues in the story. Overall, I haven't had the enthusiasm to read LOTR again.
I haven't watched the Hobbit movies, they were a Peter Jackson job again (kinda, I know), and I've heard nothing encouraging about them.
I watched Rings of Power. It gets a lot of flack, most notably what people consider to be pacing issues, yet to me fits in perfectly with Tolkien's style and IMO it also hits the right tone with regard to Tolkien's feeling of history. I liked the first season quite a bit, another feeling I got when watching it was like having experienced years of bad Star Wars movies, along comes 'Rogue One' as a breath of fresh air. People also critique RoP for not being true to the books, but I'm wondering where this criticism comes from: Peter Jackson trilogy lovers? LOL. People who criticise its pacing yet survived reading The Silmarillion? My impression of The Silmarillion from opinions of peers/the Internet is that it's pretty dry reading even in comparison to LOTR.