Should I make the switch?

gizbug

Platinum Member
May 14, 2001
2,621
0
76
My subscription with NOD32 is almost up. Wondering if it is beneficial to switch to Bit Defender 2008. Any one use either and their comments?

Running vista 64
 

nordloewelabs

Senior member
Mar 18, 2005
542
0
0
i use its free command line version for manual scans. i find BitDefender a bit slow....
from what i know, the scan engine of the 2 versions is the same.
 

CrookBloke

Member
Jan 28, 2008
52
0
0
I'd just add that NOD32 was as good as it gets. Version 3, unfortunately, has some serious problems for some applications. On a standalone desktop / notebook system it's probably going to be okay. But we've had to yank it off of our production domain entirely. It was killing servers all over the place. I hope they get the new version fixed, because it incorporates some very nice admin features which are missing in version 2.70.39 (the latest 2.x version).

If you're staying with NOD32 you might want to consider using the older version. It will continue to be supported for the time being. Eset claims that there is no difference between the two and their ability to protect a system.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
I was using bitdefender for a while, but absolutely hated how much it decided was bad. It's secure as hell, but with scanning every email in T-bird and whatnot... everything took WAY too long.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,252
12,777
136
NOD32 couldn't find or kill a virus my computer had.

However Kaspersky's had no trouble dealing with it.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
I use KAV and Panda with great success. Used NOD a couple years ago, liked it well enough, but couldn't tell you how it is these days.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
2
81
Originally posted by: Pabster
NOD32 is as good as it gets.
If you're referring to Heuristics only I will agree with ya. ;)
 

BehindEnemyLines

Senior member
Jul 24, 2000
979
0
76
NOD32 has top notch heuristics, but it fails (compared to Kaspersky or Avira for example) in signature-based detection. I have had NOD32 missed various malware that Kaspersky had no troubles.
 

jameswhite1979

Senior member
Apr 15, 2005
367
0
0
Got to be NOD32 over MS. I have been using AVG free and still very impressed I have tried many as its my job to design builds for companies but still happy with AVG Grisoft Free.
 

mentalcrisis00

Senior member
Feb 18, 2006
522
0
0
I've been using AVG for a few months and I am impressed by it, it stopped a Thus worm in it's tracks. However I had to use F-Secure online anti-virus to find a W32/Downloader and 2 TiBs entries, I was not happy. I've used NOD32 which was nice and I did use Kaspersky's once but it somehow screwed up windows, or rather I did while using it. :) I also used Norton System works for the longest time but got rid of it after my last subscription ran out, major system hog and it's almost harder to get rid of than the viruses that it detects.

I'd go with NOD32, Bit Defender is kind of slow.

-Ray
 

Entropism

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
236
0
76
There's a HUGE issue right now with NOD32 v3.0 and firewalls. I'm avoiding it for that reason alone. I'm paranoid as all hell with security, and I'm going with Comodo Firewall (with defense+ active), Avira Antivir free, and SuperAntiSpyware. All work well on Vista x64.