- Aug 5, 2004
- 8,356
- 9
- 81
So I will be going to Germany(and surrounding areas) this summer, basically the whole month of July plus a few days, and I intend to take a lot of pictures when over there. This got me thinking that perhaps I ought to add a wide angle lens to my collection, as this would allow better landscapes and more importantly easier to get more in the frame in the cities. I've been to Europe before and I remember having limitations on what I could get in the frame.
I'm considering the Tokina 12-24mm lens as that seems to be a nice middle ground between all those available. I simply can't afford a 1K lens, so thats out of the question, nor would I want to spend that much. I was looking at the Sigma 10-20, but I'm a little worried about it as it seems to be very hit or miss. Some people get nice examples with reasonably clear lenses, and others keep sending them back hoping for clearer ones. Also it seems to suffer badly with lens flaring. The Tokina doesn't seem to share those issues, although I suppose a few have that fate. Also another advantage being the Tokina's end does not move when focusing, which would be great with a CP filter, which I was planning on unless thats a bad idea?
So do you all think it would be worth it? I can get it for ~$480, which is on the high end for me but do-able. I'd prefer something around 300 but that doesn't really seem to be possible.
Also would I really miss those extra 2mm the sigma would give me? I'm thinking not, and the extra zoom on the Tokina is nice.
My gear:
D50
Nikkor 50mm(Love how clear this is!)
Sigma 28-80
Quantaray 70-300(not great I know, it came with the camera although image quality really isn't to bad. I don't use it a lot)
I've got a tripod but I won't be bringing it with me, I simply don't want to lug it around with me. It would mean walking around with 3 bags on me most of the time: camera, back pack, and then tripod. I don't think it would be worth the hassle.
I'm considering the Tokina 12-24mm lens as that seems to be a nice middle ground between all those available. I simply can't afford a 1K lens, so thats out of the question, nor would I want to spend that much. I was looking at the Sigma 10-20, but I'm a little worried about it as it seems to be very hit or miss. Some people get nice examples with reasonably clear lenses, and others keep sending them back hoping for clearer ones. Also it seems to suffer badly with lens flaring. The Tokina doesn't seem to share those issues, although I suppose a few have that fate. Also another advantage being the Tokina's end does not move when focusing, which would be great with a CP filter, which I was planning on unless thats a bad idea?
So do you all think it would be worth it? I can get it for ~$480, which is on the high end for me but do-able. I'd prefer something around 300 but that doesn't really seem to be possible.
Also would I really miss those extra 2mm the sigma would give me? I'm thinking not, and the extra zoom on the Tokina is nice.
My gear:
D50
Nikkor 50mm(Love how clear this is!)
Sigma 28-80
Quantaray 70-300(not great I know, it came with the camera although image quality really isn't to bad. I don't use it a lot)
I've got a tripod but I won't be bringing it with me, I simply don't want to lug it around with me. It would mean walking around with 3 bags on me most of the time: camera, back pack, and then tripod. I don't think it would be worth the hassle.