Should I get a Asus Geforce2 MX or Radeon 32MB DDR for this system?

Jamezuva

Member
Nov 20, 1999
139
0
0
Hi,
My Voodoo3 3500 has gone nutso on me so I need to replace it and am considering these two cards, the Asus Geforce2 MX and Radeon 32MB DDR. I hear that Radeon's are better in game especially in higher resolution but that Asus has much better drivers. They are pretty close in price taking into account the buy.com coupons. Here is my system below..which should I get? I usually play games such as UT, Diablo II, and Q3A. Thanks.

Athlon 700
Asus K7V KX-133
128 mb pc100 ram
Maxtor 20.5 GB Diamondmax Plus 7200
Running Win2k professional

 

Babrone

Member
Oct 9, 2000
38
0
0
The radeon would probably look better for those games you mentioned, but the win2k drivers are not very good for the radeon. You can use beta drivers though, which have much improved win2k performance. Maybe you should just flip a coin or something, you really can't go wrong with either card.
 

StickHead

Senior member
Sep 28, 2000
512
0
0
I would go with the MX, it's cheaper, sweet drivers, more overclockable. To me, slightly better image quality I don't really notice anyway so I went with the GeForce2 MX.
 

vulpeculla

Member
Feb 11, 2000
61
0
0
Is there a problem with the AGP socket for the K7V? I once read somewhere that a bios update will correct that?
Thanks
 

Taz4158

Banned
Oct 16, 2000
4,501
0
0
I would go with the MX, it's cheaper, sweet drivers, more overclockable. To me, slightly better image quality I don't really notice anyway so I went with the GeForce2 MX.

This is a joke right? The MX better than the Radeon? It WAS funny though.
 

lsd

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2000
1,184
70
91
For win2k yes MX would be better. Even a voodoo 4 would be better.