Should I finally take "Bimmerchick" out of my sig?

[GTaudiophile]

I've been accused in GH to linking to pr0n.

I personally don't consider it to be pr0n, but that is for you (and the mods) to help me decide.

Note: Time to swim across the lake, so I won't read the responses for a little while.

 

[Hammer]

its not exactly work safe, but i don't think its bad or anything.

 

[Ophir]

I think I speak for everyone when I say:

I DON'T CARE

 

[guyver01]

hellz no!

//me wantz more

 

[boyRacer]

I'd rather have a Bimmerchick than a Bimmerguy in your links anytime.

 

[Maleficus]

Leave it in there, it's not porn and if you want it in your sig keep it.

 

[Rent]

no

 

[bunker]

Originally posted by: Maleficus
Leave it in there, it's not porn and if you want it in your sig keep it.

 

[notfred]

What do people expect to see when they click a link that says "click here to see more of her"?
Is it pornography? I guess that depends on how you define pornography, but it's definitely not graphic and it's behind a couple layers of abstraction from AT. I'd leave it in if you like it.

 

[conjur]

If someone's b!tching about that...they're ghey

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Whoa. I never knew that was what your sig linked to!

Thanks for the ...

- M4H

 

[aphex]

Originally posted by: Ophir
I think I speak for everyone when I say:

I DON'T CARE

How to you speak for everyone when your clearly using a 1st person perspective?

 

[Dudd]

Damn, I never knew there was more. The original pic looks best though.

 

[MikeMike]

i c panties!! but that must be just my thoughts!!

MIKE

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Yeah, there's a "You have been warned" caption ... and wtf do you expect from "Click to see more of her" ... what, surely they didn't think that just meant "more pics" ... Literally, More of HER!

And that's always a good thing.

- M4H

 

[amnesiac]

I let loose a big FATTY flame on his stupid ass for you, GT.

 

[codeyf]

NO.

 

[Shawn]

Originally posted by: guyver01
hellz no!

//me wantz more

 

[Haircut]

I wouldn't consider bimmerchick to be porn, but whitedog is correct when he says that porn is only a couple of clicks away

 

[GoodToGo]

No, she is the reason I come to ATOT

 

[crt1530]

No.

 

[nan0bug]

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NO!

 

[mugs]

The bird crap in the fourth picture was a nice touch.

 

[pulse8]

Originally posted by: Haircut
I wouldn't consider bimmerchick to be porn, but whitedog is correct when he says that porn is only a couple of clicks away

Porn is always a couple of clicks away when on the intarweb.

 

[guyver01]

The site does not in any way fall under the definition of pornography:
Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal



The pictures are not sexually explicit.