- Jan 2, 2006
- 10,455
- 35
- 91
I'm currently running my Q6600 at 400x9. BIOS vcore is currently set at 1.5V, but real world vcore after vdroop is ~1.4V. I haven't gotten around to actually finding the lowest stable vcore yet, so if this seems high, it probably is.
1. So should stability at a certain vcore be stated as a BIOS setting or as the actual vcore after vdroop? I think the latter because different motherboards have different amounts of vdroop, so a mobo that doesn't droop as much may seem to be able to run the same CPU at the same clock speed at a lower vcore than a mobo that droops more.
2. Also, the CPU is rated to a maximum of 1.5V. Since my mobo's vdroop seems to be -0.1V, does this mean I can safely set 1.6V as the vcore in my BIOS while trying to get a higher overclock?
1. So should stability at a certain vcore be stated as a BIOS setting or as the actual vcore after vdroop? I think the latter because different motherboards have different amounts of vdroop, so a mobo that doesn't droop as much may seem to be able to run the same CPU at the same clock speed at a lower vcore than a mobo that droops more.
2. Also, the CPU is rated to a maximum of 1.5V. Since my mobo's vdroop seems to be -0.1V, does this mean I can safely set 1.6V as the vcore in my BIOS while trying to get a higher overclock?
