- Feb 10, 2000
- 30,029
- 67
- 91
See this item and this - apparently, under California law, NRA president (and former Moses!) Charlton Heston may be required to surrender his guns if his doctor determines he is mentally incompetent due to his apparent senile dementia/Alzheimer's.
I think this is potentially an interesting debate, in that he may literally end up reaching a point where he will continually forget how to operate a gun, making them potentially dangerous to him and others. I sincerely hope for his sake that his disease does not progress to that point, and that he is never found to be mentally unfit, but if he does continue to deteriorate, this will no doubt turn into an occasion for a political debate between the NRA and the state of California. I certainly do not think he could lawfully be compelled to give them up simply on the basis that he might ultimately be found unfit, but once he has been medically determined to be incompetent, there is a real constitutional question IMO. Apparently his attorneys have already begun to argue on his behalf that he should be allowed to keep them.
What do you think?
I think this is potentially an interesting debate, in that he may literally end up reaching a point where he will continually forget how to operate a gun, making them potentially dangerous to him and others. I sincerely hope for his sake that his disease does not progress to that point, and that he is never found to be mentally unfit, but if he does continue to deteriorate, this will no doubt turn into an occasion for a political debate between the NRA and the state of California. I certainly do not think he could lawfully be compelled to give them up simply on the basis that he might ultimately be found unfit, but once he has been medically determined to be incompetent, there is a real constitutional question IMO. Apparently his attorneys have already begun to argue on his behalf that he should be allowed to keep them.
What do you think?
