Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
No, because
1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
Thank you.Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
No, because
1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
It was a great model. I think we should go back to lynchings, while we're at it. The wild west was awesome, at least in Tombstone. Can I be doc holiday?Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
No, because
1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]
The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.
Still costs more to put somebody through deathrow. In the inerest of justice the process must be strenuous and allow plenty of appeals. To make it cheaper than life in prison even more corners are cut. Yes, it costs more.Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]
The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
It was a great model. I think we should go back to lynchings, while we're at it. The wild west was awesome, at least in Tombstone. Can I be doc holiday?Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
No, because
1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.
2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.
3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.
The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.
Not when you consider the years of appeals (gov't-paid lawyers) and years spent in a dedicated cell on death row.Originally posted by: Condor
A tombstone is a lot cheaper than a room in maximum security.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.
The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Still costs more to put somebody through deathrow. In the inerest of justice the process must be strenuous and allow plenty of appeals. To make it cheaper than life in prison even more corners are cut. Yes, it costs more.Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]
The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.
And no, it's not a deterrent to other criminals. For all intents and purposes somebody under max security cannot escape, so they are as safe to society in there as 6 feet under ground.
There is NO practical benefit to capital punishment. It is state-sponsored revenge, plain and simple.
Originally posted by: Tango
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0777460.html
The USA are the only first-world country in the whole globe that still applies it. Should make one wonder....
Originally posted by: bdude
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
No, because
1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.
2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.
3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?
1. The state does NOT represent the people. The political power structure in place represents the state. The state is a function of government, regardless of what the population may or may not want.
1A. So how come your boy isn't President. Because the people decided otherwise.
2. The cost of safety is more than just "a little less population". The theoretical underpinnings of the American Justice system is the notion of fairness and well...justice. I for one cannot have faith in a justice system that is as flippant as your remarks, and nor should anybody.
2A. The chance of error is a very excellent deterrent. With scientific proofs that are avaliable today, the chance of error is minimal if the standard "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is enforced. The reason that we have error is that Judges apply rules to the jury that corrupt that standard and accept circumstantial evidence. The issue is not the death penalty, but the rush to convict that has seized most DA shops in the last thirty years.
3. It may prevent one individual from ever killing again, but the problem is that there is conflicting evidence on whether it is preventive of other individuals commiting similiar acts.
Originally posted by: Condor
1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.
2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.
3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?
Originally posted by: conjur
Not when you consider the years of appeals (gov't-paid lawyers) and years spent in a dedicated cell on death row.Originally posted by: Condor
A tombstone is a lot cheaper than a room in maximum security.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.
The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.