Should Capital Punishment be allowed?

khunkami

Member
Jan 9, 2005
167
0
0
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment

When there is no doubt about a killer there should be an immediate public execution.

There was a lot less crime back in the early U.S. Western days, the few crimes that did get committed were sensational especially the executions.

There was so little crime, locks were not even needed or encouraged.


 

desy

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2000
5,446
214
106
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment
Thank you.

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
If you are christian and believe in eternal life, how is there a death penalty? Just Heavens Gate a little early, or perhaps hell. Send'em on and let God judge - says that in the bible - maybe a little weak on the send'em on part, but not on the judgement.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
It was a great model. I think we should go back to lynchings, while we're at it. The wild west was awesome, at least in Tombstone. Can I be doc holiday?

 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,614
6,170
126
Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:

ROFL
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment


1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.

2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.

3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]

The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,035
6,597
126
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.

The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,614
6,170
126
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]

The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.

Because you can and because mistakes happen.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]

The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.
Still costs more to put somebody through deathrow. In the inerest of justice the process must be strenuous and allow plenty of appeals. To make it cheaper than life in prison even more corners are cut. Yes, it costs more.

And no, it's not a deterrent to other criminals. For all intents and purposes somebody under max security cannot escape, so they are as safe to society in there as 6 feet under ground.

There is NO practical benefit to capital punishment. It is state-sponsored revenge, plain and simple.

 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: desy
You mean the voilent West where crime was low cause people were too busy killing each other?
Yeah great model :roll:
It was a great model. I think we should go back to lynchings, while we're at it. The wild west was awesome, at least in Tombstone. Can I be doc holiday?

"I'm your Huckleberry."
 

bdude

Golden Member
Feb 9, 2004
1,645
0
76
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment


1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.

2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.

3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?

1. The state does NOT represent the people. The political power structure in place represents the state. The state is a function of government, regardless of what the population may or may not want.

2. The cost of safety is more than just "a little less population". The theoretical underpinnings of the American Justice system is the notion of fairness and well...justice. I for one cannot have faith in a justice system that is as flippant as your remarks, and nor should anybody.

3. It may prevent one individual from ever killing again, but the problem is that there is conflicting evidence on whether it is preventive of other individuals commiting similiar acts.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Christian or not one of the main "benefits" of capital punishment was its "ability" to act as a deterrent. Well, Texas has killed how many? Has crime stopped in Texas? No. Will it stop? No.

Capital punishment costs our government far more money than does a person serving life in prison. Eliminate the death penalty. It's useless.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.

The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.

A tombstone is a lot cheaper than a room in maximum security.

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.

The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.
A tombstone is a lot cheaper than a room in maximum security.
Not when you consider the years of appeals (gov't-paid lawyers) and years spent in a dedicated cell on death row.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: sandorski
The Death Penalty is unnecessary. [/discussion]

The cost to society for keeping a killer alive and well in prison is tremendous. Why pay it? Give the criminal no more sympathy than he/she did to the victim. Fix the criminal, not the system.
Still costs more to put somebody through deathrow. In the inerest of justice the process must be strenuous and allow plenty of appeals. To make it cheaper than life in prison even more corners are cut. Yes, it costs more.

And no, it's not a deterrent to other criminals. For all intents and purposes somebody under max security cannot escape, so they are as safe to society in there as 6 feet under ground.

There is NO practical benefit to capital punishment. It is state-sponsored revenge, plain and simple.

It doesn't have to be a deterrent to toher criminals as long as it deters the one. I disagree that it doesn't deter others. Certainly the chance of life in prison or freedom on appeal does encourage them. Fast, sure death would certainly deter them. unfortunately, liberal leadership has made murder a crime with minor penalties, giving rise to other crimes becoming murders simply because the penalities for rape, assault and others being worse than the penality for murder. Kill the witness and get the lesser punishment! What a deal!

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: bdude
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: khunkami
Just wonder,,, If you are Christian, do you allow capital punishment(execution)?
I would say yea, cuz it may decrease criminal rate...just wonder...

No, because

1. the state has should have no authority over life and death
2. when they have been granted such authority, they have made grievous errors, executing innocent people
3. the best evidence available shows no deterrent effect of capital punishment


1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.

2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.

3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?

1. The state does NOT represent the people. The political power structure in place represents the state. The state is a function of government, regardless of what the population may or may not want.

1A. So how come your boy isn't President. Because the people decided otherwise.

2. The cost of safety is more than just "a little less population". The theoretical underpinnings of the American Justice system is the notion of fairness and well...justice. I for one cannot have faith in a justice system that is as flippant as your remarks, and nor should anybody.

2A. The chance of error is a very excellent deterrent. With scientific proofs that are avaliable today, the chance of error is minimal if the standard "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is enforced. The reason that we have error is that Judges apply rules to the jury that corrupt that standard and accept circumstantial evidence. The issue is not the death penalty, but the rush to convict that has seized most DA shops in the last thirty years.

3. It may prevent one individual from ever killing again, but the problem is that there is conflicting evidence on whether it is preventive of other individuals commiting similiar acts.

3A. Keeping the one individual from killing again is worthy and sure.

 

jer0608

Member
Sep 24, 2004
96
0
0
Originally posted by: Condor



1. The state represents the people and society has a right to determine its own security.

2. If the cost of safety is a little less population, how is that bad if you aren't one of the mistakes? There are no perfect systems and mistakes spare as many as they cost.

3. The dead don't come back and repeat the crime. How is that not deterrent?

What if you are one of the mistakes? Can you imagine how that must feel, being imprisoned for years, knowing that you will be put to death for a crime you didn't commit, watching hope slowly die? Imagine the toll on your family. If private citizens inflicted such misery on another human being, regardless of their intentions, it would be classified as murder with aggravating circumstances. They might even get the death penalty for it :|.

In the event the system breaks down and an innocent person is executed, should we then prosecute the prosecuters, judges and jurors for torturing and killing an innocent person? Oh, wait, the judicial system has society's best interests at heart, even as it snuffs out the life of the unfortunate individual and destroys their family. Better to leave them completely unaccountable for these "errors" so we can continue to have our vengeance and pay lip service to deterrence.


 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Only a fool would kill somebody to teach others not to kill. And once dead there is no fixing a mistake.

The death penalty may have been a necessary evil at a time before maximum security prisons.
A tombstone is a lot cheaper than a room in maximum security.
Not when you consider the years of appeals (gov't-paid lawyers) and years spent in a dedicated cell on death row.

I agree with you on that. We should eliminate those. Do it the Chinese way. A shot in the back of the head between the courtroom and the cell.