• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Should buy a polarizer for my Rebel XT

TraumaRN

Diamond Member
maybe dug can answer this one. I leave in 5 days. I'm debating on buying a polarizer for my Rebel XT because will I know how bright and sunny it can be in Australia and especially if I'm taking mid-day shots I don't want it to be drowned in light.

Or the cheaper option is take everything in RAW format and fix the lighting myself later on 😛
 
Get a polarizer.

A polarizer gives you information that you won't physically get in the RAW (prime example being the cutting out reflections off water/shiny surfaces).

I almost always used the CPL for daytime shooting (outside dawn/dusk), and i wouldn't go anywhere here without one.
 
Buying two depends on the size - my 77 mm polarizers cost a bit. My 58mm is nice and cheap.

Speaking of two - I dropped a 77mm one on a tile floor when visiting friends in Lake Chapala, Mexico. It was a nice German one. I replaced it with a Chinese one at Frye's in Burbank for less than $50.

Anyway - just consider this - if it is bright enough for you to wear sunglasses - why not get them for your camera. Shootiung with a filter is much better than post processing, and can even allow interesting results in the post process.

Short answer - get a polarizer.

 
Yep, get a polarizer. One unlikely shot where they are extremely beneficial is when shooting plants in sunlight -- the colors aren't washed out from reflections.
 
Originally posted by: corkyg
Buying two depends on the size - my 77 mm polarizers cost a bit. My 58mm is nice and cheap.

Hehe, my 58mm Rodenstock cost me $120. They're not all cheap 🙂
 
Back
Top