Shopping cart prank turns tragic

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kelvrick

Lifer
Feb 14, 2001
18,422
5
81
Originally posted by: Cattlegod
They shouldn't get punished that badly even if they are found. It was an accident. They should get charged with trespassing or vandalism - what the specific crime was that they did.

I mean, what about a 5y/o girl who says boo to someone while trick or treating and the person gets spooked and falls into traffic, eventually dying from the injuries. Do we put the 5y/o girl on death row? According to some of you, we do.

Thats why she wouldn't be charged as an adult. Someone who can hoist a 50lb metal object in the air has a little more mental capacity then a 5 y/o (hopefully).
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: TheSiege
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Fvck....do they know who did it. whoever did it needs to be charged with some serious sh1t

i disagree, their motive albeit stupid, wasn't to injure someone, they were just trying to be pranksters. it was a freak accident, and they need to be punished, but don't through in juvenile care just because it was a prank gone bad.

I agree. They need to be punished, but what they did was negligent, not malicious. Ruining their lives over this will not serve any purpose. I think their attitude about the situation would be most telling with regard to whether they are likely to do something so stupid again.

What they did nearly killed somebody. Their intentions and the level to which they thought through the consequences of their "prank" are irrelevant.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Originally posted by: TheSiege
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Fvck....do they know who did it. whoever did it needs to be charged with some serious sh1t

i disagree, their motive albeit stupid, wasn't to injure someone...

A drunk driver doesn't intend to injure someone either. But when you do something incredibly stupid and somebody else is hurt as a result you need to face the consequences.
 

DanDrop

Senior member
Aug 9, 2002
502
0
0
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DanDrop
The fact of the matter is, his actions, whether intentional or not has paralyzed a person who was just DOING THEIR JOB to feed their family.

The person was NOT paralyzed, and I think that is a significant factor.

This was not an accident, this was done intentionally.

They intentionally put the cart up there, but I think it is unlikely they did it with the intent to injure someone.


I stand corrected. The victim broke her neck and suffered serious head injuries but was NOT paralyzed.

But what i do not get with your argument is that someone intentionally hoisted a 30+ pound object and NOT INTEND to hurt someone? Are you serious? Do you know how much injury could result if someone dropped a 3 pound bottle on your head or an 8lb bowling ball. Try dropping one of those at just 5 feet in the air and see how much pain you'll be in and how much you'll be spending in the emergency room.

It might have been funny if he used water balloons, small bag of starch or tarred feathers instead. For Pete's sake he used a SHOPPING CART!

Morons like that should not be allowed to walk the streets if they could not at least figure out that a 30+ pound object dropping on someone's head will not seriously hurt someone.

 

TravisT

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,427
0
0
I'm not necessarily sure that this was the intentions of those who did it either. I remember being in Jr High and my neighbor had a small chain (about 4ft long) along with a lock. I wrapped the chain to the bottom of the car and locked it on there so they couldn't get it loose. My intentions then were merely just to harrass them by making them hear a clanking sound. It becomes much less funny if somehow the thing caused a car wreck or tore up the vehicle in any way. I wouldn't do it today because I do think of those types of things.

Most likely, yeah, they probably knew this was going to fall. But I don't think even I would imagine a cart causing such serious damage. I think it was probably meant more as a harassment. I personally would think that the individual would realize after messing with the rope that there was something abnormally heavy on the other end. I doubt their thinking was "hahaha, we're going to be break someone's neck."
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: TheSiege
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Fvck....do they know who did it. whoever did it needs to be charged with some serious sh1t

i disagree, their motive albeit stupid, wasn't to injure someone...

A drunk driver doesn't intend to injure someone either. But when you do something incredibly stupid and somebody else is hurt as a result you need to face the consequences.

Best analogy of the thread.

What's a typical sentence (if there is such a thing) for criminal negligence in a case where the defendant has no criminal intent?
 

TravisT

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,427
0
0
The difference here is that we are all assuming this was a child. When we talk of drinking and driving we are more than likely talking about someone who is of age to know better.

Not to mention there is no law against hanging a cart under the influence. :)
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: TravisT
The difference here is that we are all assuming this was a child. When we talk of drinking and driving we are more than likely talking about someone who is of age to know better.

Not to mention there is no law against hanging a cart under the influence. :)



this was not a child that did this. it had to be a teenager.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
Originally posted by: TravisT
The difference here is that we are all assuming this was a child. When we talk of drinking and driving we are more than likely talking about someone who is of age to know better.

Not to mention there is no law against hanging a cart under the influence. :)

I'd wager that they were at least HS students. Shopping carts are fairly heavy.
They should be tried as minors if they are, and they'll get the leniency built into the juvinile justice system.

If they are adults, try them to the full extent.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: TheSiege

well then lets prosecute mcdonalds sony and toyota
mcdonalds leads to heart disease
sony creates exploding batteries
toyota has to recall a bunch of scions

what they did hurts thousands and they get no punishment...

Wow you are dumb to draw such a comparsion. Just blow my mind how dumb you could be.

yep that post was so narrow-minded it was insane.

Still I am getting very intolerant of kids pranks that harm others...they always play the kid part even though the lived the bad part. Their parents don't help.

 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: TravisT
The difference here is that we are all assuming this was a child. When we talk of drinking and driving we are more than likely talking about someone who is of age to know better.

Not to mention there is no law against hanging a cart under the influence. :)

yes there is. Not exactly on the cart, but public drunkeness is a crime.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: TheSiege

well then lets prosecute mcdonalds sony and toyota
mcdonalds leads to heart disease
sony creates exploding batteries
toyota has to recall a bunch of scions

what they did hurts thousands and they get no punishment...

Wow you are dumb to draw such a comparsion. Just blow my mind how dumb you could be.


yeah like those little bastards that caused brain damage to a person but got the punishment put off to finish football?

that pissed me off.

yep that post was so narrow-minded it was insane.

Still I am getting very intolerant of kids pranks that harm others...they always play the kid part even though the lived the bad part. Their parents don't help.

 

TravisT

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,427
0
0
Out of curiousity, what extent of time do you feel is justifiable? Keep in mind drug addicts are only behind bars for days in many of their first offenses. Do we give these "teenagers" the same justice? I consider a drug addict much more threatening than a teenager who pulled a prank.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
Originally posted by: TravisT
Out of curiousity, what extent of time do you feel is justifiable? Keep in mind drug addicts are only behind bars for days in many of their first offenses. Do we give these "teenagers" the same justice? I consider a drug addict much more threatening than a teenager who pulled a prank.

Thats a whole other can of worms Travis, my man... ;)
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Damn that sucks. a lot of news stories these days are pissing me off.

I'm just glad that the victim will most likely will make a decent recovery and can walk.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: TheSiege
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Fvck....do they know who did it. whoever did it needs to be charged with some serious sh1t

i disagree, their motive albeit stupid, wasn't to injure someone...

A drunk driver doesn't intend to injure someone either. But when you do something incredibly stupid and somebody else is hurt as a result you need to face the consequences.

Edit

Excellent comparison. I'd say 5-10 in FPMITAP would be fair. If it happened to me I'd want that at least, plus compensation for my medical bills.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: DanDrop
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DanDrop
The fact of the matter is, his actions, whether intentional or not has paralyzed a person who was just DOING THEIR JOB to feed their family.

The person was NOT paralyzed, and I think that is a significant factor.

This was not an accident, this was done intentionally.

They intentionally put the cart up there, but I think it is unlikely they did it with the intent to injure someone.


I stand corrected. The victim broke her neck and suffered serious head injuries but was NOT paralyzed.

But what i do not get with your argument is that someone intentionally hoisted a 30+ pound object and NOT INTEND to hurt someone? Are you serious? Do you know how much injury could result if someone dropped a 3 pound bottle on your head or an 8lb bowling ball. Try dropping one of those at just 5 feet in the air and see how much pain you'll be in and how much you'll be spending in the emergency room.

It might have been funny if he used water balloons, small bag of starch or tarred feathers instead. For Pete's sake he used a SHOPPING CART!

Morons like that should not be allowed to walk the streets if they could not at least figure out that a 30+ pound object dropping on someone's head will not seriously hurt someone.

You're assuming that they expected it to fall (on someone). I'm assuming they put it up there because they thought it was funny, and they assumed someone would notice it before they lowered the flag. Either of us could be right. If they intended for someone to get hurt, that's a diffent story, and they should be punished accordingly. If they didn't intend for someone to get hurt, then I think they should be punished less severely.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

What they did nearly killed somebody. Their intentions and the level to which they thought through the consequences of their "prank" are irrelevant.

Sure they are. Perhaps they are not relevant to your knee-jerk reaction, but they are certainly relevant.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: CKent
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: TheSiege
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Fvck....do they know who did it. whoever did it needs to be charged with some serious sh1t

i disagree, their motive albeit stupid, wasn't to injure someone...

A drunk driver doesn't intend to injure someone either. But when you do something incredibly stupid and somebody else is hurt as a result you need to face the consequences.

Edit

Excellent comparison. I'd say 5-10 in FPMITAP would be fair. If it happened to me I'd want that at least, plus compensation for my medical bills.

wow....try to get out more. Still that was not an excellent comparison...hardly related really other than those that just live life vicariously.
 

Crucial

Diamond Member
Dec 21, 2000
5,026
0
71
The punishment should be such that it deters other idiot kids from doing something similar.

It's called taking responsibility for your actions. What they did caused someone else great bodily harm, no matter what they "intended" to happen. You play the game you pay the price. I am sick of people pushing blame on the victims and not making the people responsible pay for their actions.

 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
That really sucks, and I hope that the injured woman makes a full recovery -- AND that those kids get a damn good punishment for what they did.

But you must admit, from a purely hypothetical perspective, the image of a shopping cart randomly falling from the sky on someone is pretty funny.