I have mixed emotions about this. On the one hand, I dislike Obama's agenda and I dislike Presidents (and government in general) overreaching. On the other hand, I really, really dislike pro forma sessions to stop recess appointments (especially to cripple departments and/or agencies you don't like), I think EVERY nominee deserves a timely hearing and an up or down vote (I don't give a damn if the Senate votes on nothing else but budget bills - in fact I'd prefer it - but advice and consent is one of the Senate's Constitutional responsibilities), and I recognize that this is a natural procession - people like power, and people who REALLY like power tend to be politicians, and every President (post-Truman anyway) tends to grab a little more power than his predecessor enjoyed. On the one hand I'd prefer a power-grabbing President to be more in line with me politically and philosophically. On the other hand, a power-grabbing President not at all in line with me politically and philosophically probably makes it easier for me to disapprove of the power-grabbing.
So on balance - meh?